objected because it is the coronation we ob ected. , , ., because it is the coronation we ob ected. , , objected. this is a problem with eo - le in objected. this is a problem with people in britain objected. this is a problem with people in britain today, - objected. this is a problem with people in britain today, alwaysl people in britain today, always trying to destroy anything that is great for britain or anything we try to showcase in britain. the coronation to showcase in britain. the coronation is to showcase in britain. the coronation is trying - to showcase in britain. the coronation is trying to - to showcase in britain. the coronation is trying to destroy our denrocracy coronation is trying to destroy our denrocracy the coronation is trying to destroy our democracy. the free, coronation is trying to destroy our democracy. the free, the - coronation is trying to destroy our democracy. the free, the police . coronation is trying to destroy our i democracy. the fr
little bit of respect? shouting or should they ust have a little bit of respect? shouting or should they ust have a little bit of respect? good morning. good morning, little bit of respect? good morning. good morning, eileen. little bit of respect? good morning. good morning, eileen. as little bit of respect? good morning. good morning, eileen. as the - little bit of respect? good morning. | good morning, eileen. as the public are funding good morning, eileen. as the public are funding this good morning, eileen. as the public are funding this coronation - good morning, eileen. as the public are funding this coronation in - good morning, eileen. as the public are funding this coronation in the i are funding this coronation in the public have the right to make their opinions felt whether they support it or whether they object to it. and as far as those objecting to it, those protests are peaceful, then i don t see any problem, i don t see why they should be restricted from th
discussion we should be, to bring about a discussion about this. our head of state. discussion about this. our head of state. a discussion about this. our head of state. a lot discussion about this. our head of state, a lot of people are pretty indifferent towards the royals and the sway indifferent towards the royals and the sway of allegiance brought out people s the sway of allegiance brought out people s questioning, why are we doing people s questioning, why are we doing this? we should have that discussion, we don t have enough discussion discussion, we don t have enough discussion about the role of the head discussion about the role of the head of discussion about the role of the head of state, it is very one sided. the republican view is not put forward the republican view is not put forward enough to show the proportion of people who have that view proportion of people who have that view if proportion of people who have that view if you proportion of peop
the cost. but i acknowledge you have a right to protest. a right to protest. if we didn t have a monarchy a right to protest. if we didn t have a monarchy and - a right to protest. if we didn t| have a monarchy and spending millions have a monarchy and spending millions every year on their security, millions every year on their security, may be the police would not be security, may be the police would not be so security, may be the police would not be so stretched. the idea that we are not be so stretched. the idea that we are causing a problem by voicing our opinion we are causing a problem by voicing our opinion and saying the have issues our opinion and saying the have issues and our opinion and saying the have issues and spending so much money on the monarchy issues and spending so much money on the monarchy is an absurd argument. i am the monarchy is an absurd argument. i am not the monarchy is an absurd argument. i am not being the monarchy is an absurd argume