welcome back to the hardball. presidential candidate rand paul took a shot at democratic front-runner hillary clinton in my interview with the senator from kentucky earlier today warning that she s more likely to take to us war than most democrats or republicans. let s watch. hillary clinton is much more hawkish and much more likely to get us involved in another war than most of america, republican or democrat. you see this little boomlet for other people out there it is. yeah. on the democrat side there are people who aren t so eager to believe that hillary clinton was right taking us to war in libya, and so i think you ll find that as it gets out to the regular voters outside of washington there s a much more mixed and nuanced feeling about war. on a scale of 1 to 10 dove being 0, hawk being 10, where s hillary? you know, i m not sure exactly. is she a 7? yeah. i think what she is i think she s been indiscriminate in the use of force and i think not thinking. joinin
in a fairly recent poll in pennsylvania head-to-head and doing best head-to-head with her nationally and everybody else in your party is trying to be a hawk and you re the only one that says i don t think the american republican voter, the religion republican, not the neo-con, not someone who reads the weekly standard by a regular republican voter is tired of these war. why does bill kristol have all the influence. hasn t traveled outside the beltway enough. once he gets out into the rest of america in kentucky where we live in middle part of the america or anyone outside the beltway, there s a disconnect between the washington insiders and the rest of us in both parties. hillary clinton is much more hawkish and more likely to get us involved in another war, than most of america, republican or democrat. you see the little boomlet for other people on democrat side. people aren t so eager to believe that his his was right to take us to war in libya, and so i think you ll find that as