which is consumed in detroit, and circulate the revenues from that food within our community, then we re able to create a more vibrant, healthy, economically strong community. so we think it has tremendous potential. anthony: who will live in the detroit of the future? there s no question, is there, that detroit will come back? in one form or another, a city this magnificent, this storied, this american, cannot, will not ever, disappear into the weeds. there are too few places this beautiful, for it to be allowed to crumble like angkor or rome. someone will live in a smaller, tighter, no doubt hipper, much contracted new detroit. but who will that be?
will share your views on that in the hour. remind you you can vote as often as you like throughout today s show. all right. today we re following new reaction to that declassified intelligence report, vis-a-vis that question, our fuls of america question on russia s meddling in the 2016 presidential election. in part the report concludes russian president vladimir putin ordered a, quote, influence campaign directed at the election. after being briefed on the intelligence community s findings, the president-elect seemed to drop just short of them, though. his chief of staff tried to clear the air. does he accept that the russians were behind this hacking campaign? yes or no? sure. he s not denying that entities in russia were behind this particular hacking campaign. president obama received the
issues. so what you re hearing from lindsey graham, though, is he cannot believe the reaction from the president elect. your response is you agree with the responses coming from donald trump? well, i think we heard this morning from the incoming white house chief of staff. i think we ll hear from the president-elect himself later this week. but i think there is no question that there is continuing area for investigation, that our intelligence services are going to continue to do that and bipartisan leaders will continue to do that as well. should the president-elect be questioning the validity of what the intelligence community is coming forward with? i think if you look at the republican party, that s not something as a whole they want to be something. as with some of the other things with trump we see that doesn t factor into the way that he behaves. when you go back to trump supporters and talk to them, the people that actually voted for him, you know, on the ground, this is
intelligence community, do you do so but not necessarily air it out in public? instead stay in line but again look behind the scenes, if you will, and then come forward? fix it first and then come forward? it really does undermine the people, the mission, the work in every one of the intelligence agencies. and this is not just me saying this. this is the head of the agencies that are saying this. they are worried about retention and worried about losing their people because their leader, the president of the united states, does not believe them. this is something we see over and over from trump. and we start to question where the line is if he doesn t like the answer. he just disqualifies the entire thing. look, there is no question now coming from the intelligence agencies that putin mettled in the election in part to get trump elected. so then you hope to see from a leader is saying, well, if that s the intelligence, i am going to prove through my actions i am not going to be acts
the last 20 minutes or so. 87% of you disagree. you disagree to that question. again, about donald trump right to be skeptical. you re saying no. now, we break it down by age, you can see this as we get older in age or younger, whichever we like to see here, the younger groups, 18 to 24 are more split as you get 55 plus it is the opposite, where it s a strong disagree. and then you can see the younger age groups changing over time. and then when we break it down by political party, both parties and independents, they disagree. democrats more so as you can see here. to finish it off again, 88% disagreeing in terms of donald trump right to be skeptical of u.s. intelligence agencies. thank you for that. next, confirmation hearings are set to begin f.