Latest Breaking News On - American national security - Page 1 : vimarsana.com
package and then go back to united states senate, who will then pass it and then to the president. that is because both of our chambers need to have identical legislation passed to have identical legislation passed to have a unified bill to go to the president for his signature. you mentioned _ president for his signature. you mentioned the _ president for his signature. you mentioned the impact on ukraine. president biden wanted this package about six months ago, i think. how much damage do you think it has done to the war effort for ukraine to haveit to the war effort for ukraine to have it delayed for so long? i5 to the war effort for ukraine to have it delayed for so long? is it too late? what _ have it delayed for so long? is it too late? what is _ have it delayed for so long? is it too late? what is frustrating about this is that at the end of the day, what is going to get to the present�*s desk is what is asked for six months ago, with hardly any changes, except for these tiktok issues being dealt with. so that is very thin rule and it has cost lives. it has harmed ukraine's ability to defend itself, it is undermine american national security. it is undermine the reputation with europe. it has made our system looked frail. as a result of this, when speaker, is taking a political risk because it is likely now members of his party will call
PresidentPackageLegislationSignatureBillBothChambersUnited-states-senateUkraineDamageImpactWar-effort
for him to be removed from the speakership, i believe that now we can restore our national security, our global reputation, but this was all unnecessary, political posturing by the far right american politicians, which is in the minority. it is worth mentioning very clearly that the rule for the overall package got nearly three quarters on the house floor, meaning that the minorities are dominating the delay game but the majority is overwhelmingly for this type of support for ukraine. i’m overwhelmingly for this type of support for ukraine.— overwhelmingly for this type of support for ukraine. i'm 'ust can ut one support for ukraine. i'm 'ust can put fl support for ukraine. i'm 'ust can put of h support for ukraine. i'm 'ust can put one one of the h support for ukraine. i'm just can put one one of the republican i support for ukraine. i'm just can i put one one of the republican said, he said he was concerned with finding foreign wars rather than secure the border. does that kind of rhetoric cut through?— rhetoric cut through? imagine that, that the speakers _ rhetoric cut through? imagine that, that the speakers are _ rhetoric cut through? imagine that, that the speakers are trying - rhetoric cut through? imagine that, that the speakers are trying to - that the speakers are trying to protect american national security. this is not how it is supposed to work. we are supposed to have bipartisan security and by parties and national security, and support
SecurityReputationSpeakershipPosturingRulePackagePoliticiansDelay-gameMajorityMinorityMinoritiesHouse-floor
suddenly, it's quite sobering. but it is interesting what susan just said, that he sounded like a republican from the before times. he sounded, david, like one of us. in fact, he was saying exactly what we've been saying here and what you've been saying over the past several months. >> look, i applaud it. i applaud it. >> same here. >> i think a couple things are happening at once. one, the situation on the ground in ukraine was becoming obvious to everyone. there was no ambiguity here on the urgent necessity of american aid to keep russia from winning this war. the other thing that was happening is his hard-right flank was getting crazier and crazier. he began to realize, i think, and he should have known it a long time ago, he is not dealing with serious people. he's not dealing with people who have both eyes on american national security. he's dealing with a fringe that is just lost to conspiracy land. you cannot govern a country
One-of-usTimesFactDavid-ignatiusRepublicanOneThingsEveryoneSituationGroundUkraineThing
kowtowing to that faction. look, seeing the rise of a kind of coalition arrangement in the house is good for the united states of america. it's good for this country when we have bipartisan legislation that protects american allies and protects american national security. this is one of those no-brainer pieces of legislation in many ways that was being held up by some of the weirdest, wildest, craziest, and almost you hate to call them arguments, in american public life. just wild propaganda was holding up this aid. i think at long last, he realized he's not really speaker of the house, not really, if he is beholden to marjorie taylor greene. so this is where he decides he has to be speaker of the house if he is going to hold that position. marjorie taylor greene, if she's going to take him on, let her do her worst. i think this was not just an important moment for ukraine, for israel, for taiwan, it was a very important moment for american governance. i've known mike johnson for many
U-s-CountryKindHouseLegislationAlliesFactionAmerican-national-securityRiseCoalition-arrangementOne-of-usWays