Page 267 - Ami News Today

Story of an effort to kill another story of damaging information of donald trump. in 2015, american media inc. a company that owns the "national enquirer." bought the rights to the story of a man who worked as a doorman. ami killed that story. what was the doormans story? he claims that donald trump had a secret child with a former employee at the trump organization. the doorman even gave the name of the mother and child to ami. yesterday, we got a statement from dino sajudin. today i learn the ...

They have done and catch and killed to benefit donald trump. what does he do for them in return? thats a question. >> whats also interesting kore. any publicly are saying they didnt find the person credible they paid $30,000 according to ronan reporting they work aggressively on the story gave a lie detector test to the person which the person aldly passed. not admissible in court. very fallible. but if near paying the $30,000 though the publishers says they dont believe. >> its intriguing and a...

Was instructed not to criticize president trumps former housekeeper due to a prior relationship she had with president trump which produced a child. theres no evidence that theres a love child, but do you think hes telling the truth? >> look, what we say is we havent found any evidence, and ill leave it at that. but what is absolutely incontrovertible now is that there is a third payment that is receiving demands for legal scrutiny from a lot of different quarters. theres the stormy daniels paym...

Whether its the southern district prosecutors or robert mueller. this is the second story now were hearing, and we heard the guests on before us talk about there being conflicting evidence about michael cohen being in, you know, communications with pecker about these stories. so i think its perhaps just a matter of time before federal prosecutors want to know whats in the office of ami, what kind of evidence may be there to support that these stories are being killed not because theyre not credi...

Payment, the karen mcdougal story, which she spoke to me first and then to anderson in the firstati tv interview, and says her story was suppressed, and ive seen some of those contracts and that appears to be the case. and now it seems like in the karen mcdougal case there was a catch and kill. >> but its interesting ami saying its not true, but why on earth would they pay $30,000 and then have an extra clause on top it for what was it? >> a million dollars. all i can say is that the ami sources...

Pointed out is seeing esuggestive -- not sufficient to establish, but suggestive intent to influence election. >> the bigger question is a is sort of a pattern emerging of how michael cohen allegedly dealt with allegations like this, rumors like this, stories like this. we have seen three -- three examples really thanks to your reporting. and also, the dwrd that the big firkt idea is that if there are more stories out there that ami and the "national enquirer" bought and killed they have files o...

Ronan farrow said this piece was unconfirm and salacious. according to the agreement with ami, sajudin can speak about the issue, but not any money from the company. he cannot speak about the matter further. ami is denying that trump or michael cohen had anything to do with pursuing the story. they said david pecker, the publisher of the ami, never used any funds to shutdown the story. >> conversations recorded by trumps lawyer before and during the 2016 campaign were likely scooped up in the ra...

Pecker >> thats what we report as a claim from several of the sources involved. you know, they say he was calling regularly about this. now ami we should point out has flatly doid that. a source close to the white house referred us back to am. theyre referring to each other. i think with the raids happening and the probes happening that fbi raid this week focusing specifically on finding these kinds of transactions and communications related to them with michael cohen more may come to light abou...

That they were working in tandem to protect donald trump, thats extraordinary. >> during an election cycle, which election law experts pointed out is seeing-- not sufficient to establish, but suggestive intent to influence election. >> the bigger question is a is sort of a pattern emerging of how michael cohen allegedly dealt with allegations like this, rumors like this, stories like this. we have seen three -- three examples really thanks to your reporting. and also, the idea that the big idea ...

The two incidents. ronan hit the nail on the head which are what are the national security implications. if there are the secrets out there or accusers out there, if trump and the people around him are willing to pay money to make them go away who has power over him how are they using the power? this is what weve been asking about russia all along. wove been asking if there is russia has on him financial or otherwise that gives him unfair advantage and leverage over him. were asking that questio...