Page 71 - Ami News Today

You know and he had ami whose job was t fix this they agreed, these three entities agreed, dont worry all of the dirt in your bed, w will fix it. so when the dorman comes forward, give him 30 grand, fi it when the first woman karen mcdougal comes, no problem, we will fix it. then the third one comes along stormy daniels, we will fix it but then at some point the criminal justice system steppe in and said hey, michael cohen what was this long - oh you didnt tell the truth, t the bank felony and t...

Conduct. why did donald trump repeatedl make these false statements? the evidence will show that he did so to cover up crime relating to the 2016 election. donald trump, executives of th publishing company, amiri -- mr. cohen and others agreed in 2015 to a catch and kill scheme that is, a scheme to buy and suppress negative informatio to help mr. trumps chance o winning the election as part of this scheme, donald trump and others made thre payments to people who claim t have negative information...

By a ally. those seem rock-solid, because the campaign finance stuff, al of their issues about whethe it is a federal, there are issues there, if it state, there are issues there but on ami false busines records and tax, take a stat tax offenses, you have to prov that that was the intent, bu it is not the same kind of legal challenges so what i see when i look at this is it is gonna be ver hard to not miss out as motion to dismiss. meaning, the prosecution wil get its day in court, whethe they p...

Mid-made yet more fals statements, including fo example, an ami, american medi incorporates, business records one of the three people that they paid to keep quiet was woman named stormy daniels less than two weeks before the presidential election, michael cohen wired $130,000 to stormy danielss lawyer that payment was the hiding of damaging information from th voting public. the participants scheme wa illegal. the scheme violated new york election law, which makes it a crime to conspire, to prom...

To make these payments, they set up shell companies and the mid-made yet more fals statements, including fo example, an ami, american medi incorporates, business records one of the three people that they paid to keep quiet was woman named stormy daniels less than two weeks before the presidential election, michael cohen wired $130,000 to stormy danielss lawyer that payment was the hiding of damaging information from th voting public. the participants scheme wa illegal. the scheme violated new yo...

Committed another crime. and andrew is right. the new york state election aw the federal campaign law, if that was all it was based on, then it really makes it a really difficult case but the tax fraud and the ami false statements, that makes it im not going to say a rock solid case, but you could understand why this case was presented and why the d.a.s office believe they have proof beyond a reasonable doubt. and if the jury can believe, okay, weve got the new york state election law but tax fr...

And then the intent to commi or conceal another crime so a, as andrew said, it doesnt say that you intend to defraud and you committed in other crime. so, as andrew was right, the new york state election law, the federal campaign law thats, if that was all it was based on, then it really makes it a really difficult case but the tax fraud and the am false statements, that makes it, im not going to say a roc solid case, but you ca understand why this case was presented and why the das office belie...

That just resulted i convictions in november. so, those give the da a lot of room so even if there is a attack on one or two of them particularly the state crime of tax fraud and the ami false statement charge, seem ver solid. it seems very hard to imagine motion to dismiss thats going to knock out all of that and reduce all of the charges to misdemeanors >> and it doesnt mean tha when you describe, andrew, the district attorney as havin laid out a lot of differen paths by which he can get to a ...

Christas question in the last segment, where he said isnt this still a really tenuou case, isnt there a proble because this is a legal issu in this case more than a factual issue. and this is where i wa actually impressed in terms of what was charged there because theres so man different ways in which the da as laid out how he can get to felony he has suggested in his oral remarks that one way is th federal campaign laws. another way is the state campaign laws. a third way is he talked about ami...

You dont actually have to commit that crime. so, thats why you would necessarily need to charge it. thats something that alan bragg said also, if one of the crimes tha your thinking could be used as that bump up is a federal, crime and then that is not something you could charge the state court anyway now, this really goes to christas question in the last segment, where he said isnt this still a really tenuou case, isnt there a proble because this is a legal issu in this case more than a factual...