need to see some real conclusion and everyone is entitled to due process, whether it s president trump, whether it s representative santos or president biden. no one is above the law. no one is below the law. we cannot have this. it s unacceptable. congresswoman, thank you so much. the georgia prosecutor today investigating donald trump s alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election said the decisions on whether to bring charges against multiple dependents are eminent. joining us now is the deputy national editor of the washington post and andrew wiesman, former senior member of the mueller robe. the da says these decisions are eminent. what does that tell you? she speaks of multidefendants. i think the word innocent is shotgun that everyone jumped on.
merrick garland sees on the committee chair? i don t know. one of the things he could do is have an interim step in the way he did with president biden. he can have a preliminary review. it s possible that preliminary review could lead to someone saying there s no evidence whatsoever of intent. if you have no evidence of intent, you have no crime to investigate. so it s not there s a way to do some preliminary look and decide not to because we are in a very dangerous period where you can t have a special counsel for each and every time there s a discovery of classified documents. phil rucker, andrew, thank you. that does it for this edition o chris jansing reports right after this. threports. chris jansing reports right after this
Transcripts for MSNBC Deadline White House 20200918 21:24:30 archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
checks and balances and that witnesses haven t. there s really ground separation of powers. consequences to this. he sat there at the bridge, at so, you know, if they were the front lines and saw, you know, soldiers who are defending pursuing oversight and not their country and he thought the impact of this politics has, you impeachment. that s a different conversation. yeah. i don t understand what the difference is between that know, real consequences for them argument you re making. on the ground. i mean, the in order to make so you re right. it s absolutely tied into the decision about impeachment, russia. it s tied into putin. in order to which is it s tied into trump s essentially a grand jury relationship with putin. putin, no doubt, trash talks indictment, you do an investigation to get that. that s what they re doing here. ukraine every chance he gets so part of what they re doing is with with trump and that has clearly impacted his view of the oversight. they haven t
thinking about what andrew sort of implied here? is what s the remedy? what s the end game here? how much do democrats in that house committee need to be thinking about, okay, we ve got the case we ve got to that s ensure max protein, make has got to be so convincing, it s for removal with high protein and 1 gram sugar. from office? it s a sit-up, banana! well, i ve long believed that bend at the waist! i m tryin ! keep it up. you ll get there. given the stakes and the whoa-hoa-hoa! 30 grams of protein, importance of checking executive and one gram of sugar. ensure max protein. branch and the president s do you recall, not long ago behavior, that democrats should not be focused on removal. we would walk on the sidewalk the purpose of impeachment is all around the wind blows not for the purposes of removal. we would only hold on to let go that is going to come and i think that they ve got to let blow a kiss into the sun the evidence take them, demonstrate it to the ame