little after that. that is what i started looking into. the story we published is less about the dobbs decision itself to overturn the right to abortion and more about the question, can the supreme court investigate itself? i think this is relevant from a policy perspective because the court answers only to itself. it is an independent branch of the government. you describe some of the details, which i would love for you to talk about. i m going to read some of the piece here. lower level employees have been formally interrogated, reported, pressed to sign affidavits. in contrast, conversations with the justices have been a two-way iterative process in which they ask as well as answer questions, the marshall, gayle wrote. but she had seen no need for them to sign affidavits. tell us about this tutored investigation if you will. well, part of the reason why some people, who have worked inside the court, are very upset is because they said how
has been transparent in this as well is that the white house counsel has laid out in detail on monday to all of you you know that. first of all i can t talk about this, right? this is the department of justice reviewing it. there is a review happening. you know this. we just heard from the attorney general, here is a review. i am limited in what i can say to this. maybe richard could come here? i think you should reach out to the white house counsel. i am reaching out at a constant basis. okay, i am saying to you that we have put out lengthy statements and you can reach out to them as you all of been doing. and i will leave it there. go ahead. go ahead. why not have them come answer questions? they have been talking to you all pretty regularly the last couple of days. we have put out, they have put out lengthy statements on this. i just read out what richard scarborough had to say and i
a trench of transcripts for of it s also people who said some inconvenient things abou president trump. including lawyer pet cipollone and former attorney genera bill barr. of the ones that are jus released, which transcripts ar most interested in i think those two that yo mentioned are incredibly important. pat cipollone i think i wa just coming through it and h does answer questions he doe provide information and he was there in the inner circle so i think he s someone who i incredibly important the other one that i am chri about who haven t looked at get can fulfill ski, to me is fascinating figure it isn t even show up to the justice department for his job until december 2020 a few said to. and he is working for jeffre clark, and he drops this lette as proof of concept from georgia. he seems like the glue between the two separate threads of th scheme so i m here s what he had to say. we know what our holida reading list is.
probe each aspect. i wouldn t accept those answers if i was with the justice department. if you want the answers, one thing you can do is grant them immunity. barb, it s not just the i don t recall caucus that we got the trash of transcripts from. some people said inconvenient things about president trump including lawyer pat cipollone and former attorney general bill barr. of the ones released, which transcripts are you most interested in? i think those two you mentioned are incredibly important. pat cipollone, i was skimming through it. he does answer questions. he does provide information. he is in the inner circle. he is someone who is incredibly important. the other one is ken. he doesn t show up to the justice department until december of 2020. after his election and a few weeks before the administration is set to end. he is someone who knew john