Clerk we should open this up for Public Comment. If you wish to speak to an item proposed for continuance only on the matter of continuance, you should hit star 3 now to be queued to speak. Can i ask why the item was continued, the brannan street one . Clerk brannan i dont believe it was proposed to be heard today. To be honest, i dont know why the brannan item is being continued. Okay. I set time to show up and we got notification by mail. Clerk the item is listed on agenda as matter of continuance on the agenda. Thank you sir. Good afternoon commissioners. My family and i live at 2843 geary boulevard. I understand that theres a continuance thats been requested to address things with the tenant. I like to voice those concerns. Clerk unfortunately, at this time, you cannot on matters proposed on continuance. We are taking Public Comment but only on major of continuance and not. Project itself. Is that 2845 geary boulevard . Clerk it was listed 2843 and its continued to october 15th. Wo
And so i hope you consider the evening permit. Thank you. Thank you. Weve had a couple more callers join us. Speaker im in full support of prestige and their efforts and i own a business and several things in the community. Prestige opened its doors when we were having violence in the city and one of the only places to open the doors for us to meet. And this is an amazing establishment and the people who are amazing. The security is amazing. I heard the lady speak before me me. Ive been there and i know the security does their best to move people along so that theres parking and so do i respect her views . I have to humbly disagree with her. Im sure that she could speak with the owners of the establishment to come to a reasonable resolution where both parties are happy. Thank you for the support. My name is damion post. Thank you. Speaker good afternoon. Im a longtime resident of San Francisco is a member of local ten, iowu and we have had a few events there and this is a beautiful ven
Secondly the letter of approval is usually included by, excuse me by the permit holder. I didnt see that either. Lastly in the last page of their submission they show various sites that they attempted to look out, i presume, but they provide very Little Information there. The code says something about good faith efforts. When so many puts on the table that there was no interest. I have no idea whether that is a good faith effort, or not. I need to see these things before i make a final decision. I would be happy to respond. My understanding, the first item you brought up was our compliance with the Design Guidelines and preservation review. Did i understand that correctly . Historical review. I can respond to that. This is not within the webster street historic district. It is immediately adjacent to the district which was established in 1981. This property was not included. It is a category d building for our preservation standards. Included in the report is a ceqa exemption which is
Is usually included by, excuse me by the permit holder. I didnt see that either. Lastly in the last page of their submission they show various sites that they attempted to look out, i presume, but they provide very Little Information there. The code says something about good faith efforts. When so many puts on the table that there was no interest. I have no idea whether that is a good faith effort, or not. I need to see these things before i make a final decision. I would be happy to respond. My understanding, the first item you brought up was our compliance with the Design Guidelines and preservation review. Did i understand that correctly . Historical review. I can respond to that. This is not within the webster street historic district. It is immediately adjacent to the district which was established in 1981. This property was not included. It is a category d building for our preservation standards. Included in the report is a ceqa exemption which is signed by our Historic Preservat
Is usually included by, excuse me by the permit holder. I didnt see that either. Lastly in the last page of their submission they show various sites that they attempted to look out, i presume, but they provide very Little Information there. The code says something about good faith efforts. When so many puts on the table that there was no interest. I have no idea whether that is a good faith effort, or not. I need to see these things before i make a final decision. I would be happy to respond. My understanding, the first item you brought up was our compliance with the Design Guidelines and preservation review. Did i understand that correctly . Historical review. I can respond to that. This is not within the webster street historic district. It is immediately adjacent to the district which was established in 1981. This property was not included. It is a category d building for our preservation standards. Included in the report is a ceqa exemption which is signed by our Historic Preservat