Department now. Good evening, commissioners madam chair im on behalf of the respondent of department of health so this started with the directors hearing so that means the director of health has designated that essentially the Health Officer of the department to hear those permit appeal matters and thats because article 33 is in the health code this is the health issue. And the remits in article 33 are pretty state your name for the record and the majority of those concerns Health Issues for example, does the dispensary operate a growth on site do they intend to allow smoking within the facility do they summit American People accurate security plan those are all Health Related concerned that can be traced back to the state law the com pack at act you have the director that heard in this matter from both appellant here today as well as the party of interest youve heard from the members of the public he had before him the paperwork submitted by ms. Michelle who was seeking to become the
Is located within the s z downtown plan. The project is to legalize point 7 thousand Square Feet Office Space that has primary assess from the ground floor. The building formally occupied by staceys bookstore was previously a cvs says that a Building Permit for the material permit was approved by the San Francisco department of building inspection but was not routed to the Planning Department this conditional use is seeks to legalize the construction no physical modifications to the building have proposed. Since the project packets were submitted to Public Comment open this project. The Department Recommendation is for approval with recommendations and a as he department of seemed desirable not alternating formula retail along next speaker. Market street and will increase the office space and desirable for and comparable with the surrounding neighborhood that concludes my presentation. Unless theres comments. Project sponsor. Good morning, everyone. John doe i didnt on behalf of the Re
Commissioner hillis. Commissioner johnson. Commissioner sugaya. Commissioner fong. Commissioner president wu. So moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 6 to zero and places you on item 16 for the next case. 581 Market Street as long as stephen son street request for conditional use authorization good afternoon planning staff before you is a conditional use authorization under planning code section to legalize the establishment of the professional business offices below the offer basement building on Market Street street so long as as he stevenson street located on the south side of the street. Is located within the s z downtown plan. The project is to legalize point 7 thousand Square Feet Office Space that has primary assess from the ground floor. The building formally occupied by staceys bookstore was previously a cvs says that a Building Permit for the material permit was approved by the San Francisco department of building inspection but was not routed to the Planning
So long as as he stevenson street located on the south side of the street. Is located within the s z downtown plan. The project is to legalize point 7 thousand Square Feet Office Space that has primary assess from the ground floor. The building formally occupied by staceys bookstore was previously a cvs says that a Building Permit for the material permit was approved by the San Francisco department of building inspection but was not routed to the Planning Department this conditional use is seeks to legalize the construction no physical modifications to the building have proposed. Since the project packets were submitted to Public Comment open this project. The Department Recommendation is for approval with recommendations and a as he department of seemed desirable not alternating formula retail along next speaker. Market street and will increase the office space and desirable for and comparable with the surrounding neighborhood that concludes my presentation. Unless theres comments. Pr
The facility do they summit American People accurate security plan those are all Health Related concerned that can be traced back to the state law the com pack at act you have the director that heard in this matter from both appellant here today as well as the party of interest youve heard from the members of the public he had before him the paperwork submitted by ms. Michelle who was seeking to become the sole owner on the permit and he granted the change of ownership. This demands of commentary papers and forged signatures theres no dlagsdz before you that anything was forged the whole discussion about the suspension of the permit as a result of the fire in the discovery of load firearm back in 2007 that is indeed old history. The suspension was issued for thirty days and there were no conditions attached. During that time period appellant had a relationship with the real parties trustee he was involved. Where was he when all this was going on you dont even need to ask that. The enti