scant legal authority for the idea the president can say, you know what? the appropriations clause doesn t bind me. so i think that s really important. number two is that was on a preliminary injunction. the court issued a preliminary injunction, said you have to turn over these records. so the trump administration is losing in the courts. the courts understand there is no king. the courts understand there s a separation of powers. the courts are standing for the rule of law, and i frankly don t think this president is going to have any more luck at the supreme court than the last two presidents that have faced this question in connection with impeachment. stay with me, everybody. there s another ruling today that was a win now for the president. well, i mean at least for now. but it means a very big test is going to come up, and what will the supreme court do? we ll try to break that down next. (people talking) for every dollar you spend at a small business, an average of 67 cents s
decision to not release the $400 million in aid for ukraine. that s interesting for a couple of reasons. one, it s because that plays into this trump narrative that the president s above the law. congress authorized the aid in september of 2018, and there is scant legal authority for the idea the president can say, you know what? the appropriations clause doesn t bind me. so i think that s really important. number two is that was on a preliminary injunction. the court issued a preliminary injunction, said you have to turn over these records. so the trump administration is losing in the courts. the courts understand there is no king. the courts understand there s a separation of powers. the courts are standing for the rule of law, and i frankly don t think this president is going to have any more luck at the supreme court than the last two presidents that have faced this question in connection with impeachment. stay with me, everybody. there s another ruling today that was a win now f