Page 104 - Arbiter News Today

Of connecticut a member 069 house intelligence committee. nice to see you, congressman. you have this letter from former president trump. does he have any legal standing in your view to continue to fight the subpoenas? >> this is an interesting question. for people not in the administration i think of steve bannon not working for the president at the time and the people associated with the stop the steal he has absolutely no claim to executive privilege. then it gets complicated. right? and i th...

Depends very often on a big lie. on an alternative reality, on something that divides friends from enemies, on something which allows people to permanently polarize, on something which allow as leader to become arbiter of whats real and whats not real. unfortunately, mr. trumps claims about what happened in the last election constitute a big lie of that kind so that now we have a political party, we have new laws, we have right-wing media which are inhabiting the alternative reality and trying t...

Now he just wants to sift through the charred rubble. thats why well never apologize for when i did this. [laughter] thats still up there if you want to look at it more closely. kat, all right, when you delete -- okay, so i dont how many years this goes over. he basically deleted his entire kind of countenance. like its not saying oh, these are my tweets. no, thats his mind. 107 -- he erased his entire mind. >> yeah, he also said i was cleaning my inbox, which if you dont know that at home, that...

President michael bolger stating all of the rules were allowed to break now because they dont have the staff. jillian: there are a number of people who filed for exemptions, different ones, whether it be religious, whether it be medical. you are one of them who filed a religious us exemption. your appeal has not been decided by the arbiter is what im understanding. if thats the case, i imagine youre not the only one. so why do you think this wasnt handled with these decisions figured out before ...

Of our government that allow people to exercise power without winning a majority of the vote, either in the senate, the president, being allowed the minority president to put people on the court, who further restrict democracy, who further restrict the franchise. theres a stranglehold on democracy by a minority of americans who feel they have the right to rule the majority. that is the escalating crisis that is facing our democracy. and the supreme court isnt a neutral arbiter in that crisis. it...

And blame everyone including the media for it. but the fact is -- listen, just look at how the justices were chosen in the most recent years. does it matter, right? does it matter to have the court viewed as a partisan apparatus in effect as opposed to sort of a grand ajude i judjude djudico issues? >> frankly, i cant imagine that anything could matter more. the court is ultimately the arbiter of what the rule of law is. and when public approval is at 37%, record lows in polling, it means that w...

Presidency, then allows a minoritarian president to put people in the court who further restrict democracy, who further restrict the franchise. theres this growing stranglehold on democracy by a minority of americans who feel like they have the right to rule the majority. that is the escalating crisis, and thats kind of facing our democracy. and the supreme court isnt a neutral arbiter in that crisis. its a combatant on the side of minority rule. >> adam, im going to give you the final word beca...

Pursue it harder and with less guard rails. >> heres something to look at. that is the newly released details of a memo written by john eastman, thats a prominent conservative lawyer who worked with trump in the weeks before the insurrection. so in this memo, eastman described the vice president as the ultimate arbiter of election results and argued that the vice president mike pence, that he had the authority to simply toss out the electoral college votes of certain states, thereby clearing the...

Pardon me, theres another high profile suit recently brought against donald trumps niece, as well as the "new york times." do you think your victory sets some sort of a precedent now? what does this mean overall for trumps ndas with former aides? >> there was a case prior to mine, the denson case that also helped my case. i think together it does in fact invalidate all those useless ndas that really were designed to allow donald trump to be the arbiter of what was confidential and what could be ...

Things are about to get a little quiet between NASA and its fleet of robotic Mars explorers. Thats because an expected communication breakdown is about to happen, all thanks to