Page 117 - Arbiter News Today

Complaint, the whistleblower, him or herself, have been attacked repeatedly. but it seems like others are corroborating that. i do want to ask you this because you served in justice, served in the fbi. look at the attorney general barrs role here because on the one hand he was participating to some degree in the presidents efforts here, meeting with foreign leaders as they do their own investigation of the investigation if you will, the russia probe. but he also under the justice department char...

We are not going to decide who is fact checking on politicians. politicians can fact check each other. they say this is what happens in radio and television ads. warren thinks her going after facebook is a way for her to get attention. >> it was a clever stunt there is a lot of opposition to facebook. by the way not just on the democratic side. a lot of people are very unhappy. the democrats are really unhappy with what they see happened in the 2016 election with the fake news and fake ads and r...

To be the arbiter of conduct when it comes to politicians and what they are putting out in political advertising, if we look at traditional advertising, other forms of media they typically, you know, people are holding facebook to a separate standard than we told traditional media. rob: as you said tv ads, radio ads, they dont have to sensor things if its not true, if you make an ad that bends the truth a little bit which a lot of politicians do, happens all of the time. >> we are still in new t...

Know what it is. >> judge jeanine: if they dont know what it is, what are you worried about? >> greg: i worry about everything. >> dana: you need to be able to recognize a systems. >> greg: i would not telegraph on a network show like that. i would hit it life with a debate. you mean metaphorically. >> dana: just a quick word on this, geraldo, elizabeth warren figured out she can go after facebook, republicans and democrats have been wanting to go after facebook. her thing is facebook should pul...

You can see adam schiff has a bias against donald trump. however there is also this trene me, they hate america. with most things the answer lies somewhere in the middle. the middle is not somewhere you are allowed to be anymore these days, you are for trump or against trump. the nuanced views depending -- they will displace you on one side of the aisle. neil: the others have said about adam schiff in particular, the conversation into the hearing and if you are supposed to be a partisan but at l...

Arbiter but do you think you have any luck telling nancy pelosi that and who would take his place? >> two points, nancy pelosi has got to at some point recognized that this is going to be judged by the american people. how this process went through. if it looks like it was at kangaroo court, star chamber type of thing, she knows theres going to be political fallout from that, so shes got to make sure it looks pretty good. the way mr. schiff has conducted it, its not gone well. we have moved into...

Would she go back? should she go back to nadler? would he be, should he be the point person? >> not mr. nava, not maxine watch waters waters, not elijah cummings. she would be better served in my opinion to put together a special committee where you take people who arent chairman, arent tainted by the process. this process has been ugly in their people and i dont think they would want to do this necessarily but i think they are fair-minded. this really gets resolved in some ways if she takes thi...

>> sandra: the house freedom caucus, which you used to chair, congressman, is calling on nancy pelosi to remove adam schiff from leading this investigation. where do you fall on that? >> well, i support that. chairman biggs has reached out to our freedom caucus members. chairman schiff is not a neutral arbiter. we saw that when he made up the actual conversation. he did what he called a parody. most of america didnt know it. he made that up and then what we also saw. i was actually in the interv...

And therefore if a crisis is to materialize it would have to be with a future refusal to obey a court order. i dont think we are there yet. >> and when you say court order, do you mean a supreme court decision on something? >> yes it. >> would be like the nixon tapes case. remember, during the nixon impeachment, congress said we want the tapes. the president said, no, im not going to turn them over. lower courts disagreed and finally the supreme court said youve got to turn over the tapes. if at...

Im a little bit baffled by the way that this story is being covered, particularly when i saw "the new york times" report on it last night. what facebook is doing here is theyre getting a lot of pressure for it from the biden campaign. theyve gotten pressure from elizabeth warrens campaign. what theyre doing here is totally in step with how every other media organization handles political advertising. you had to read the second to the last paragraph of that "the new york times" report, but what y...