Page 142 - Arbiter News Today

Should get through. i think that there is enough question about his having dissembled before the congress when he was confirmed for his current circuit court seat, and that he may have dissembled in this hearing, as well. we have evidence that he has said, i didnt have conversations, that we now know he did have. we know that his views are extreme. hes been criticized by his colleagues on his own court, from both the left and the right, for having ignored facts, for taking on issues that werent ...

Attempt to manipulate the star investigation with the information he had from the paula jones case. and, so, i know what i know. he has a set of alternative facts. >> and lastly to you, david brock, you say here that any senator that cares about the country should vote no on brett kavanau kavanaugh. >> what i think it is, my piece is not about his views. one can have a debate about what his views are. my piece is about his behavior and its about his character. and i think on that basis, behaving...

>> do you believe he lied when he claimed that he is just a neutral caller of balls and strikes as a judge? >> yes. hes completely misrepresenting himself. there was some exposure of other things that he lied about, as some of the documents came out from the bush years. we dont have millions of documents, but some of the e-mails that did come out showed he lied in his first confirmation hearing. so, yeah, there is a pattern there, too. >> im out of time. but if you had all this information, why ...

That he may have dissembled in this hearing, as well. we have evidence that he has said, i didnt have conversations, that we now know he did have. we know that his views are extreme. hes been criticized by his colleagues on his own court, from both the left and the right, for having ignored facts, for taking on issues that werent raised by the parties but served his purpose in trying to reach a particular outcome. he has been criticized for ignoring precedent. i think that theres enough reasons ...

Question about his having dissembled before the congress when he was confirmed for his current circuit court seat, and that he may have dissembled in this hearing, as well. we have evidence that he has said, i didnt have conversations, that we now know he did have. we know that his views are extreme. hes been criticized by his colleagues on his own court, from both the left and the right, for having ignored facts, for taking on issues that werent raised by the parties but served his purpose in t...

President trump. so what you have is a situation where the minority, the democrats on the senate committee, are seeking to, in fact, reveal who this character is. and from the democratic perspective this is someone on ken starrs team looking into bill clinton very aggressively and someone involved in the hanging chads of florida back in the 2000 election. someone who was on president bushs team when torture memos were being done. there are lots of questions about whether or not he is a political...

Make, danny. >> the claims of bias that conservatives make about twitter and these platforms are well borne out. but to take something that isnt highly political, what are the anti-semites doing on twitter? why are they allowed a platform, but someone who is -- as odious as, you know, we can all agree as alex jones, somehow not okay. and why does twitter get to be the arbiter of it? i guess theyre a private company, and do what you want. >> what is -- dinesh da souza is disgusting to a lot of pe...

Be what he said would be a neutral and impartial arbiter and keep an open mind in every case if affirmed to the supreme court. do you doubt him on that? >> absolutely. that is what i would call confirmation etiquette treacle. all of the judges come in and they say that stuff, and they get on the court and what happens is they pack up into a republican gang of five. and by my count, they have rendered 73 different decisions with just the five republicans that have given substantial benefits to bi...

Serious infections, which could need hospitalization; skin problems; and severe bone, joint, or muscle pain. if your bones arent getting stronger isnt it time for a new direction? why wait? ask your doctor about prolia. a good judge must be an umpire, a neutral and impartial arbiter who favors no litigant or policy.

This is the wrong way forward. >> and it was so important that theyre trying to make the point you made earlier. this is just not normal. this president is not normal. this president should not get to fick person who will be the arbiter of the future of the comey dismissal or the future of whether he violated campaign finance rules. and i think trying to make the point over and over again. this is not happening in a vacuum. this president is picking the person who will determine whether this pre...