Page 152 - Arbiter News Today

When was mr. cohen paid? did he ever reach out? there will be phone records or logs that might indicate that. for example, one year ago tomorrow may 10th, our president brought sergei kizlyak. a reported russian spy into the oval office and gave guy him classified information according to reports. thats treason. classified information. >> rob is on your team let him respond. >> classified information that was reported by our allies in israel who are under attack from mr. putins allies in iran. >...

An absolute right to that memo. they have subpoena power, impeachment power over high-ranking officials, power of contempt. ultimately it doesnt make sense for the deputy attorney general general, a very smart guy, not to sit back look at this -- frankly start with the oversight manual. every american can google the congressional research services oversight manual. 150 pages of case law. makes crystal clo clear that congress has the right to the document. >> do you believe that rod rosenstein is...

Reforms. heres what he said about how those tax cuts helped her. >> my husband kevin, he worked in the steel mill and it close down in 2012 due to the company going bankrupt. he spent the next one and a half years retraining and then at the same time searching for the job. the first year of it i then became legally behind and could no longer work. he found a job january of 2014. because of the tax cuts and the job plan, theyre taking out a lot less taxes, two to three hundred dollars less taxes ...

Enabled the dominos to sort of start falling. on the one hand weve seen all or most of these announcement in the past and they failed through pressure negotiations, but this does feet different a bit this time. is it because you have seen both -- this triainge later, if you will, added to the discussion? before it was china that was the major arbiter of progress. >> in the past there were two interkorean summits in 2000 and 2007. even before that there were interkorean joint statements in 1972...

Do you think that president trump could refuse it given the fact that the president clearly seems to be -- no matter who you are, man or woman, you not alove t -- above the law. >> but the court have spoken in clinton v jones and nixon and not only is the president not above the law in terms of whether he could commit a crime, he heads the executive branch whose job is to enforce laws as written so to say you are going to thumb your nose at due process and a quest for information in a criminal p...

Moral excellence. so when you have these two, youre holding both, what you have in effect is a recipe for a hypocrite. >> all right. that is not the case. i will never, ever pledge to be -- what is it? arbiter of moral excellence. >> im just quoting. >> im going to leave arbiter of moral excellence to my friend eddie and to scott pruitt, please do better. the house chaplain pulls an about-face, taking back his res resignation. how did he go from being forced to resign to standing up to the spe...

Interest and not waste taxpayer dollars. i think that your point is very important about what happened in oklahoma just because its a pattern. you dont just show up suddenly in washington and need the security detail to have the lights blaring, the fancy restaurant. you have a pattern of behavior you were exploiting on a local level. >> he loved every lobbyist, boondoggle, every gas and oil ceo, vacation homes, thats his jam. >> if you subscribe to a philosophy that believes that government is i...

Im going to ask you to examine mine. the information i introduced in the record yesterday. >> from the gateway pundit. >> yes, the charts that are there. these are charts. it doesnt matter whose fingerprints are on them. facts are facts. >> the gateway pundit is an arbiter of fact. come on, steve. >> wait a minute, you cant just reject everything he does because you disagree with him on one story. >> i dont take him seriously enough to check him. thats why im concerned among wants to enter what ...

Jones as a special master? michael avenatti said it was the right move. what will she be doing? >> i totally agree that was the right move. you have a situation here where the appearance of fairness is extremely important, given the public scrutiny in this case. what judge jones will be tasked in doing is vetting the privilege issue. as a neutral arbiter of that issue, so that its clear to the public and to everyone that no sides are being picked, no ones being favored. there will be no filtered...

As a neutral arbiter of that issue so that its clear to public and to everyone that no sides are being picked, no ones being favored. there will be no filtered team staff by government lawyers and agents. and on the other side the defense isnt going to get a first crack at it either. its going to be judge jones whos going to be dealing with privilege issues, and thats going to again give the appearance of fairness to both sides in this, frankly, very extraordinary case. >> i got another question...