Page 98 - Arbiter News Today

To come into number ten. there was food and drink laid on, even some games. thats a party, what games? what games? i didnt get into that! there was some sort of light—hearted awards ceremony, the kind of end of year, kind of... that sounds pretty organised. im not being a moral arbiter, but clearly, i talked to somebody who was there and was told it was going on past midnight. not surprisingly, given what the rest of the country was going through, that has really upset people. labour today of ...

In a bid to add another feather in its cap, India is waiting eagerly for its second lunar mission, reportedly aiming at landing a rover near the unexplored south pole of the moon. If launched successfully, the $141 million (Rs 603 crore) Chandrayaan-2 mission will certainly solidify Indias place among spacefaring nations across the globe.

At big tech hearing where i changed my mind on this. i was a really harsh critic of jacks up until his second congressional hearinger with pretty much got up in front of everybody and said no, i dont want to be an arbiter of truth. also p.s. nobody asked but im going to let you know. nobody sitting here should be an arbiter of truth either. no one in congress should be allowed to have this power. im going to be working to do everything i can nobody can ask this question about censorship ever aga...

Virgil Abloh, a leading designer whose groundbreaking fusions of streetwear and high couture made him one of the most celebrated tastemakers in fashion and beyond, has died of cancer. He

Accommodate both interests. you have to pick. thats the fundamental problem. and one interest has to prevail over the other at any given point in time. and thats why this is so challenging, i think. and the question then becomes what does the constitution say about that? and i want to get your reaction to what the other sides theme is. ive mentioned it in my prior questions. when you have those two interests at stake and both are important, as you acknowledge, why not -- why should this court be...

Think the other side would say, and the reason this issue is hard, is that you cant accommodate both interests. you have to pick. thats the fundamental problem. and one interest has to prevail over the other at any given point in time, and thats why this is so challenging, i think, and the question then becomes what is the constitution say about that? and i just want to get your reaction to what the other sides theme is. ive mentioned it in my prior questions. when you have those two interests a...

Had were wrongfully decided and then making it right and overturning the decision. he goes back to the issue at neutrality and said the constitution doesnt say anything about the issue of abortion. so shouldnt the court be neutral and it leave it to the state and leave it to the people to decide this and it came back to the idea of the court being an arbiter of neutrality. and because he argues that the constitution doesnt actually say anything, they leave it to the state. it definitely sounds l...

That the issue should be up to the states. states. , which struck a chord with justice brett kavanaugh. >> why should this court be the arbiter rather than congress, the state legislatures, state supreme courts, the people being able to resolve this? >> reporter: now, back in 1992, the court seemed then to be almost certain to overturn "roe v. wade," but former justice anthony kennedy changed his mind and provided that key vote to save it. so thats an important reminder that no matter how things...

Today, the arguments, what did you hear from the two of them and which way you think they might be leaning? i think after arguments to date, of course we can get some surprises sometimes even in abortion, but i think of your argument today it seems pretty clear that both of those justices are either for overturning roe v wade or at least curtailing it in a way that would make it easierfor curtailing it in a way that would make it easier for states to restrict abortion where ever they want to. �...

No exceptions for rape or incest. roe versus wade established a womans constitutional right to have an abortion and if the court upholding the mississippi law, it would undermine or overrule roe altogether. today, it seemed clear the conservative justices are ready to do exactly that. chief justice john roberts zeroing on a key issue -- viability. right now, roe and other cases prohibit states from banning abortion before viability, about 24 weeks. the chief justice saying mississippis ban on ab...