Page 14 - Arbitration Act News Today

The Bombay High Court bench comprising Justice Bharati Dangre held that the power to extend the mandate of an arbitral tribunal or arbitrator under Section 29-A of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

The Bombay High Court bench comprising Justice Manish Pitale held that any amendments, revisions, or modifications in fees of an arbitrator must only occur with the consent of the parties, as...

The Bombay High Court bench comprising Justice Neela Gokhle held that the parties should have a separate arbitration agreement between them for reference to arbitration under Micro, Small & Medium...

The Delhi High Court bench comprising Justice Pratibha M Singh held that the time limit for limitation under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is absolute in nature and it...

The decision is a welcome development that irons out the creases formed by NN Global 2 and restores faith in the well-founded approach of the courts to limit their intervention at the pre-reference stage.

The Delhi High Court bench comprising Justice Sachin Datta allowed an application made under Section 14 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, regarding the termination of an arbitrators mandate...

Zimbabwe's largest daily newspaper

The Telangana High Court bench comprising Justice C.V. Bhaskar Reddy held that the question of whether a claim is barred by limitation time is to be decided by the Arbitral Tribunal/Arbitrator...

The Bombay High Court bench comprising Justice Neela Gokhale held that in cases where an application has been made in a court concerning an arbitration agreement, that court alone possesses...

The Telangana High Court bench comprising Justice M.G. Priyadarsini held that the scope of setting aside an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1986 is very...