Arbitration Judgments News Today

A single judge has expressed disagreement with a 2023 opinion by another single judge who said that Allahabad High Court cannot entertain such applications since it does not have "ordinary original civil jurisdiction."

The article provides a precise list of thirty important judgments on Arbitration passed by Indian Courts.

No purpose would be served in holding that an application for extension of the arbitrator's mandate cannot be entertained only because it was filed after the expiry of the mandate, the Court opined.

The seven-judge Bench orally expressed its reservations with the decision of the five-judge Bench in NN Global, saying that there were exhaustive limits on judicial intervention in such matters.

The Court expressed concern that arbitration in India is being burdened by increasing judicial interference at every stage, which demotes India’s standing as a business-friendly destination.

The Court will reconsider the decision of a Constitution Bench in NN Global Mercantile v. Indo Unique Flame, which held that unstamped arbitration agreements are invalid in law.

Partially upholding arbitral awards, which would not amount to a modification, is not confined to scenarios under Section 34(2)(a), but can be applied in all scenarios under Section 34, the Court held.

The Calcutta High Court has ordered the Union Finance Ministry to set up a committee to inquire into the apparently shocking, fraudulent, and collusive conduct of the Railways in an arbitration proceeding

The article provides a precise list of 30 important Judgments on Arbitration passed by Indian Courts.

The Court dimissed a plea seeking the appointment of an arbitral tribunal while opining that the petitioner could not invoke arbitration since they are not a party to the agreement.