Page 2 - Arent High News Today

Shes got the record and shes going to have to stand up and defend what she said about isis last night. shes going to have to defend what she did in benghazi and defend all of the these decisions that shes made. the republican nominee, whoever that individual is going to be, is going to bring in a group of really capable men and women that reflect that knowledge about what veterans need. one of the great -- >> ive got to -- >> on veterans side of things, im telling you barack obama and i think in...

>> no. they cant. you dont have to take it from me. take it from the republican national committee that stated that the republicans had to get more latinos in the election. this is the big challenge right now. this debate between marco rubio and ted cruz, i mean, it probably wouldnt help him. i stood behind marco rubio during the gang of eight when he introduced the bill. probably wont help. but the point is, to be clear, marco rubio is trying to have it both ways now. he was for the bill. hes a...

Loss of sanity. you said the party would come back to the senses. its five days before christmas. trump is as strong as ever. is it a temporary loss of sanity or do you think that the problem might be more permanent? >> you know, i think that weve all let the polls consume us too much. i dont think the polls are very accurate. in kentucky a week before the governors race the polls were off by 13 points. thats where theyre supposed to be accurate. i think we have american idol type of polls now. ...

Other one i know of, with multiple shooters, was an attack back in 1983 in seattle, where a gambling club got robbed. and in the course of that robbery, the three robbers killed 13 people at that club. but other than those very unique instances, out of all of the mass shooting, high-fatality number of massacres we have had in this country in modern times, there just arent high-fatality count mass shootings where more than one person commits the massacre. it is almost always one person. but polic...

40. our next guest has introduced a bill to protect american workers by restoring traditional definition of a workweek. joining us, congressman todd young. as i was reading the introduction, its so confusing honest face. who would have thought wed be debating what a workweek is. its been 40 hours forever, right? >> consider intuitive, defies common sense. democrats in senate debating 25% increase in minimum wage. we over here in the house are trying to create a america that works. were trying to...

>> i think it was the right answer, frankly, she cannot be asked what is your biggest regret if she had not said benghazi, that would have been the story. lets remember that this happened on her watch. if she puts herself for election, part of what shes putting out is her record and the fact that she was the ceo of the state department. this happened under her responsibility, her jurisdiction, i dont think as hillary clinton, the last words that you want said on that is what difference does it m...

His analysis, it sounds just like paul krugmans analysis. its my view that if they agree about something, its probably right. >> and the argument was that if you didnt like dodd-frank, then bill kristol, said republicans, you should have come up with your own alternative like republicans used to do. they havent done that. in this case all theyre doing is standing in the way. >> its not just -- its not just the consumer financial protection bureau. you have 135 nominees right now for positions ac...

Passed the bill is not because the republican majority wanted to make sure lawmakers arent high, even if they propose high-seeming idea, because the majority in the state wanted to start drug testing people in indiana who need welfare. and indianas democrats, the minority turned that in a boomer rang. they added mandatory drug testing for lawmakers. you have to be drug tested for state money. lawmakers get paid in state money you ought to pee in a cup, too. they shamed them to test themselves. i...

The reason the indiana house passed the bill is not because the republican majority wanted to make sure lawmakers arent high, even if they propose high-seeming idea, because the majority in the state wanted to start drug testing people in indiana who need welfare. and indianas democrats, the minority turned that in a boomer rang. they added mandatory drug testing for lawmakers. you have to be drug tested for state money. lawmakers get paid in state money you ought to pee in a cup, too. they sham...

You when become a state legislator in indiana the government sets you up with a few things to help you in the new job. an office, desk, phone for instance, a page on the website with your name and picture and bio so constituents can look you up. they also might get one of these on a bill that passed the state house. a cup to pee in they can be tested for drug use. they voted to make themselves prove on demand that they personally are drug-free. if lawmakers cannot or will not submit their urine ...