Page 182 - Arguing News Today

Convenient. what matters it that it doesnt fit that it was trump supporters who are responsible for it. so when you say, valerie i would draw a line so that sent a blind belief in conspiracy when its convenient, a specific claims around the election. and this specific claims not launch by members of congress for state representatives, but by trumps legal team, all of whom knew better. all of these lawyers, went to defense law schools, they knew what they were arguing, they knew what they were br...

Attention to how these people reacted to january 6th. there was only a brief window when any of them thought that it was trump supporters who did it. what they thought it was antifa, and then as we flip of, that wasnt the case, the thought of the fbi, they call it a fed-surrection. they thought of the cia. it doesnt really matter what they believe in any given moment. what matters is that its convenient. what matters it that it doesnt fit that it was trump supporters who are responsible for it. ...

Stop the information from spreading. what you do is you shadow ban, you send out like signals that this person is off-limits, dont even think about their ideas. this sort of sly way of trying to get your way without actually arguing over facts. its insane. i think instead -- its also telling, laura. instead of arguing over facts, they used these techniques because they knew their arguments were not strong enough to survive the light of day. i really just dont know how to process it. i grew up in...

Will make _ of some of the court to uk markets will make a — of some of the court to uk markets will make a significant contribution to the _ will make a significant contribution to the uks balance of payment. one arr uinu to the uks balance of payment. one aruauin for to the uks balance of payment. one arguing for the _ to the uks balance of payment. que: arguing forthe mine to the uks balance of payment. que: arguing for the mine employment to the uks balance of payment. iez arguing for the ...

Still a lot of instability for them to come. ~ , .., ., to come. we will be covering that over the hours _ to come. we will be covering that over the hours ahead _ to come. we will be covering that over the hours ahead on - to come. we will be covering that over the hours ahead on the - to come. we will be covering that over the hours ahead on the bbcl over the hours ahead on the bbc news channel. right, coming back to the uk, taking us to the front page of the times. not the main story, but the...

Opinions that wouldve made it so therell be more steps for an interpretation of what a judicial ruling would do in a state court. but they didnt seem to be willing except her... for to go as far as the conservative lawyers were arguing, who didnt try to meet the court when they were trying to finagle an argument that might be able to be more friendly to the north carolina state legislature. i think that also hurt the argument. its really one to watch. as peter says, we see democracy being tested...

U—turn, is this in your view a prime minister who is listening to his mps, or is he being pushed around by them? it mps, or is he being pushed around by them? , . ~ , them? it is a prime minister whose authority within _ them? it is a prime minister whose authority within his _ them? it is a prime minister whose authority within his own _ them? it is a prime minister whose authority within his own party - them? it is a prime minister whose authority within his own party is - authority within h...

When you look at it as a student of all of this, its something to see, allen weisselberg has been on the trump organization for 15 years just to have seen him on the stand to have to testify against the trump organization was really something. and it came back so quickly. you know, just sitting in the courtroom for so many days and listening to the testimony, the idea, and its interesting, because you go back and forth, when youre listening to the testimony and the idea that allen weisselberg di...

High managerial position or a higher managerial position. thats what the law prescribes. the judge said something that you said when we first started talking about that. that the former president is not on trial here. hes not sitting at the defense table. this is about two specific corporations and the jury is going to have to determine whether or not the trump organization and those two specific legal entities, in fact, are the ones that benefitted from this, prosecutors arguing, like, they did...

Of arguing. >> what we argue law. [laughter] >> will you talk about keeping a log. [laughter] >> try it, call back. >> what about the remote, is that a euphemism. >> it is interesting.is >> yes swallow the i remote joe. [laughter]>> >> now seems like way to to many arguments, way too much makeupuc sexual they should see bothor other couches. >> that is true in fact another 300 arguments into her idiot this is a makeup sexual thatf ma means that there were at least 35 arguments, result arguments....