Page 327 - Arguing News Today

Have changed. the supreme court has changed decisions over time. >> exactly. i mean, thats what democrats are arguing. there is really no telling from a political argument standpoint or just generally what is going to happen when these justices actually confirmed. jon: we heard hilary clinton earlier in the hour saying that the appointment of judge kavanaugh could take us back to the 1850s. republican senator lee had some thoughts about that. listen. >> i think it reflects a certain animus that ...

People who were cooperating is that bob mueller is moving methodically through each aspect of what has been the known interference. if it doesnt lead to the top, if donald trump ultimately said wild, irresponsible, many people feel disturbing things in public but there isnt the evidence to prove that he was involved in these conspiracies, we would not expect based on the way it works that bob mueller would overreach or do anything else. but hes clearly showing and weve seen today more than weve ...

Ambassador kay bailey hutchison a couple of days ago saying putin can smell weakness. and the most important thing we can project right now is unity. and, you know, lets do the arguing about the dues and the payment in, thats relevant, but it shouldnt overshadow the importance of unity, because, you know, the baltic states are right on the front line. and the last thing we want to do is to invite aggression, because then how do we respond? but andrea, i want back this morning and found a letter ...

The american president is about to declare the nato alliance not just obsolete, but ineffectual and maybe defunct. >> its really two summits on parallel levels. the leaders level and their photo ops and meals and closed door sessions and all that and then there is the staff meeting. these professional staff members, most of them with multiple summits under their belts conduct their own diplomacy. whats that going to be like given what the top of the ticket is like with the u.s. delegation? >> th...

Coming to discussion about reforms that need to be made on the national security front. >> susan, another sensitive subject, theres a growing chorus of people as you know on the left arguing that if confirmed president trump supreme court nominee brett kavanaugh to recuse himself from decisions related to the special counsel robert muellers investigation. what is the basis of that argument and do you believe theres any chance kavanaugh would sit those decisions snout. >> well, i think the basis ...

Government rendered them basically separated. its the governments responsibility to put them back together as quickly as possible, talking about using documentation and at the extreme end possibly some dna tests. that is the argument right now. how are you going to get those thousands more together by the 26th deadline. >> thats right. miguel, lets see what happens today as weve said almost every day. really appreciate it. joining me now, attorney and immigration expert raul reyes, thanks for ...

Trump administration went to the court in los angeles -- >> let me read the part, i want to get this because weve talked about the flores decision. this essentially without getting into too much detail, a decades old court settlement thats intertwined in this whole thing. the judge, the judge said that with the government -- the judge said this -- it is apparent that the trump administrations request is a cynical attempt to shift responsibility to the judiciary for over 20 years of congressional...

Then some lawmakers stepped up senator elizabeth warren called him a political animal for his time in the bush white house and call justice kill brand and bernie sanders vowed to fight his nomination. >> he did exactly what he said he would do. he has h appointed someone, who will not protect a womans right to make decisions about her life, her healthcare, her reproductive freedom. this judge must not become the next justice on the supreme court. >> i am not going to kid anybody. this iss a toug...

Justice souter was. >> neil: and that raised some concerns for judge barrett, her arguing in support for supreme court justices voting to overturn precedent when they fundamentally disagree with it. did that or do you think that put her in conflict with chief justice roberts who were told is not such a big fan of re-visits present? the only reason i mention it is the context of roe v. wade. what do you think of it? >> all of the supreme court justices vote to overturn precedent based on a series...

Country. trumps trade fights will be most harmful to people who voted for him. could be truth in that. charles, how are you? where are we on all this today? >> there is no doubt the retaliation whether its china, e.u., canada, mexico aimed at trump voters or states that trump won. ironically is against world trade organization rules and rules of trade and defies what they are arguing. i crunched a lot of numbers. i got the raw data from the u.s./china business council. i imagine chinas $34 billi...