Page 347 - Arguing News Today

>> reporter: he knew it probably didnt look good to police. >> i guess me admitting that i would hide her if thats what she wanted, you know, i can understand them saying that, you know, maybe hes hidden her. >> did you hide her? >> i wish. >> did you drive to see heather that night? >> no. >> were you with heather that night? >> no. >> did you have anything to do with her disappearance? >> no. >> reporter: ed told police he was at home, far away in eastern tennessee. and revealed that despite t...

Mentally ill or you have to have involuntary commitment. or obviously criminal background. so where would the resistance come from on that? do you think republicans? staunch gun rights advocates would be okay with whether its a doctor or a family member or some kind of quick article 78 proceeding, some quick judgment assessment that this person has, whatever the criteria are. do you think thats something gun rights advocates would accept? >> i think it would depend entirely on how it was written...

It just said be honest. thats my point about it. if you dont want guns anymore, just be honest and say that. >> katie: i just want to address your point of arguing that the founding fathers could have never seen this was going to happen. the thing about the constitution and the amendments and bill of rights as it applies equally to everyone. in the first amendment. the damages that has done to its society and the discourse that we have in this country, he can make the same argument. the first am...

>> those who had spent the most time with cody came under immediate suspicious. >> i baby-sat for them when they needed me to. >> including jims mother. >> there were three people designated as suspects. who were they? >> me, my son and ronda. >> i always thought i failed as a father to protect my son because i didnt know what happened to him. >> we were frantic. we were trying to figure out what was wrong, what had happened. then they took cody to foster care. >> from the beginning, they wanted...

Kids? we can no longer say that. >> listen you know from experience because youve been where the people of parkland florida are tonight. you have a chance now to tell lawmakers something they could do to make a difference. what do you want them to do? you said its a multipronged approach, more than just, you know, guns. its more than just mental health. there are a number of things that can be done. what do you want? >> well, and i want to see us put all the pieces to the puzzle together. that w...

Out to the politicians today, the students in parkland, is we need to cross aisles. because as this arguing is going on, kids are dying. we cant allow that to happen. whether it be egos or philosophies we need to cross these paths to come together to decide what do we have to do to stop this from happening? and thats my plea out to them. because i -- i cannot tell you the number of memorial services that i went to not only at columbine but the aftermath of columbine of kids who took their own li...

Situation. they intentionally put a lot of footnotes, amplifying in a way the nunes did not. that memo was written with an eye towards eventually releasing it to the public. they werent putting a lot of extra information or amplifying information. it was a lot factual statements. he knew what he was doing. he wanted to get in this situation where he can accuse other people of trying to cover this up. but i think it should be released, whatever redactions need to be made. i dont think it will alt...

Daca and if anything doesnt happen for those kids, its on republicans. whereas you have seen the protesters here on capitol hill talking to democrats as much as to republicans trying to urge them to get something done. so republicans are arguing, you shut down the government saying you wanted to have this debate. now here we have. we have a week to do this and your proposals are not ready to go. so definitely crunch time. mitch mcconnell setting a deedlideed dead line and we have yet to see the ...

Could be fair overseeing a fraud case against trump university based on his mexican-american heritage. yesterday, the very judge heard more than two hours of arguments from three separate parties over the border wall issue. and william was on hand for developments. >> we will begin immediate construction of a border wall. >> say the pledge is in jeopardy. thanks to california. >> of the happens in our backyard, we demand to be carried out in the right way. >> california claims any authority that...

Presidents border wall. as william la jeunesse tells us the man who will decide this case is all too familiar to president trump. >> he is hispanic, i believe. he is a very hostile judge to me. >> candidate judge disparaged the judge suggesting he could not be fair because of his mexican heritage. a year later he is in trumps cross hairs. >> well begin immediate construction of a border wall. >> he is hearing a challenge by the state of california and environmental groups against the border wall...