Page 460 - Arguing News Today

Concluded that 21 people, 21 defendants, were sentenced to death. now, the families of those 21 people are saying this is not justice. that completely what happened on saturday was just a ad hoc trial, sham trial. thats why they took to the streets and clashed with police, and another 30 people in port sayeed were killed. it really highlights how everything in this country now has become political. even sporting matches or sporting events, but it also really sheds light into how the government h...

>> two questions about her which i think you know the answer to. one is her organizational capacity. >> right. >> its not that she is out there, arguing, litigating every single case out of the s.e.c. you need to be able to run the agency. >> right. >> two, her understanding of the implications, the moral implications and legal implications of complex financial doings. is she capable over doing it? >> look, she is as smart as you will find anybody to be. she understands all of this. ive been on ...

>> i actually have no idea. and i dont think it is really a particularly important issue to address from the podium here. >> so what really happened? i do not care. in 2009, it was called yo-yo ma pretended to play the cello, because the strings could snap. you know what, i was writing, it was awesome. i would not have expected when i saw the first destinys child video that beyonce would actually sing the anthem at the inauguration of the first black president. i wouldnt have seen it at all if n...

Two, seek remedies that go way beyond money. reorganize the banks and is the way they do business. remedies has been the problem of the s.e.c., even when they prove guilt, they say pass a little money and we go away. thats not enough. and three, the rule-making capacity. and i dont just mean rules about how they issue their proxy statements. i mean rules that empower shareholders to finally run the companies on the behalf of shareholders, not on behalf of the ceos. those are the three different ...

Change its stance? >> you know, alex, i have to be honest, ive been hoping all along and saying candidly, i thought leon panetta was the secretary of defense that would lift this ban. i felt like given his history this was something he would understand. the fact that it came as a suggestion unanimously from the joint chiefs makes it very validating for me. being in the military, so its not -- the people who dont want things dictated to the military, they cant say that now, because the joint chie...

Shareholders, not on behalf of the ceos. those are the three different metrics im looking for. >> two questions about her which i think you know the answer to. one is her organizational capacity. >> right. >> its not that she is out there, arguing, litigating every single case out of the s.e.c. you need to be able to run the agency. >> right. >> two, her understanding of the implications, the moral implications and legal implications of complex financial doings. is she capable over doing it? >> ...

We was in the gym and i guess one thing led to another. i guess he snubbed me. >> yeah? nothing happened in the gym? >> arguing. >> dont lie to me. something happen in the gym between the two of you guys? fighting behind the curtain? be straight with me because you know im going to look at the cameras. >> it was no [ bleep ] >> listen were you fighting in the gym? >> nothing happened in the gym but words. i was just saying [ bleep ] to him. >> okay. so you guys had words -- >> i offered him to f...

Or put thousands of american troops on the ground to go get them by some standard rules of warfare that some might think are better to prosecute a war -- >> i dont -- >> and i dont think thats the best way to necessarily prosecute this war. >> thats not what im arguing, though. and i dont think thats what this debate is about. i think that we kill people in wartime using all sorts of means that americans would find distasteful when viewing them from the comfort of our living rooms, right? >> abs...

Classified information. is he going to send a drone in to get them? or put thousands of american troops on the ground to go get them by some standard rules of warfare that some might think are better to prosecute a war -- >> i dont -- >> and i dont think thats the best way to necessarily prosecute this war. >> thats not what im arguing, though. and i dont think thats what this debate is about. i think that we kill people in wartime using all sorts of means that americans would find distasteful w...

Warfare that some might think are better to prosecute a war -- >> i dont -- >> and i dont think thats the best way to necessarily prosecute this war. >> thats not what im arguing, though. and i dont think thats what this debate is about. i think that we kill people in wartime using all sorts of means that americans would find distasteful when viewing them from the comfort of our living rooms, right? >> absolutely. >> killing people in wartime is something you do by all sorts of horrible means. d...