Page 542 - Arguing News Today

Latest updates on this topic.

Nearly two decades gets the green light. a federal judge is denying the appeals of inmates set to be executed today for sexual assault and murder charges. jack jones and marcel williams arguing, listen to this, that they are too unhealthy and overweight to die by lethal injection. the judge didnt buy that and killers were part of an effort in arkansas to execute 8 inmates in 11 days before lethal injection drugs expire. and those are a look at your headlines so far. lots going on. steve: indeed....

However, there is an iron he had a hit hidden victory over these last several years, peoples expectations have changed. you watched the debate over the last three months. what are the grounds? they are liberal grounds. how many people will lose their coverage? how can you lead people out of my cold? with jimmy kimmel thing. it is showing that the people is at a point where i think it believes in universal coverage. once you are there, the ground is shifted. republicans and conservatives are goin...

>> youre paying more for less, and well make sure that the public is aware of that. i think they walk the plank. their desire to give a tax break for the rich just trumped everything. >> all right, josh, well get to the politics in a moment, but the policy. republicans say -- you heard it there -- lower premiums, more competition. you know how democrats are framing this, worse care, tax cut for the rich. whats the reality? >> i mean, the reality here is that it shifts the basic bargain that was ...

Options for what could be a new and revised health care plan, mulvaney is arguing that it is wistful thinking to be talking about obamacare in its earliest most optimistic phase and that people need to recognize where it is now and that there have been some areas where it is not working, and that he thinks has affected the debate. heres the management, the director of the office of management and budget, trying to explain that sort of mental approach to assessing these options and the choices th...

Wednesday that this judgment displays unprecedented judicial overreach. what do you say to that? >> well, i dont think that judge watson was necessarily overreaching since there is precedent for the courts to be able to look at the context. context matters. in other words, that is something in a the u.s. government has been arguing, which is that the only right thing to do is to look at the four corners of the document to see whether or not there is neutral language. unfortunately for them, the ...

Some things, but you also get blamed for anything goes wrong in the system once youre in charge of the reform. i think letting the system collapse that having a replacement, that invites problems out in the states where republican governors want a system that keeps the process safe. >> jon: last question on this, clearly theyre not in any mood to make changes to the affordable care act, obamacare, there were some 12 hours as i understand spent in committee considering one democratic amendment wh...

>> is there war between the west and radical islam? >> its radical but its hard to separate because you dont know who is who. >> the judgment also citing statements from some of mr. trumps top advisers. >> when he first announced it he said muslim ban and he called my up and said put a commission together and show me the right way to do it legally. and policy adviser steven miller that argued the new ban would have the same impact as the old one that was blocked by the courts. >> mostly minor te...

Watered down version of the first one. is this judicial overreach? >> lot of people are wondering that don and could be a point of contention moving forward in this. lot of people saying should we look to intent as stephanie mentioned, intent of someone not even president at the time, making campaign statements. point out something interesting though as all of this was unfolding in hawaii and looking at cases tonight, interesting opinion came out from the ninth circuit tonight. as you remember t...

Concerned about certain ways that we would pay for this. like a border adjustment tax that could raise, apparently a trillion dollars over ten years. theyre fighting over that. do you think that they have to swallow that to deal with that, that even if something on paper at least makes the deficit worse, they should just go ahead and do it and hope for the best? >> get rid of the democrats paper. this stuff called revenue neutral is all a democrat design. we all know and history has proved when ...