coming up i was loyal to that product. on the whole story. i blame johnson & johnson baby powder. we have never confirmed a finding of asbestos in any product that has been sold. do you consider it an abuse of bankruptcy law? i do. i definitely do. welcome to the whole story. i m anderson cooper. tonight, cnn chief investigative correspondent pamela brown brings us the story of three women in legal battles with one of the largest health care companies in the world over a commonly used household item they say is responsible for causing their cancers. that product is johnson & johnson talcm baby powder. for more than a century, the name johnson & johnson was sin onmm with baby powder. these are just three of tens of thousands of lawsuits johnson & johnson is facing over this product which was discontinued in the u.s. and canada in 2020. johnson & johnson staunchly denies these claims and you ll hear from them directly in this hour about their methodology and the
there is accreditation for asbestos in the built environment. there is accreditation for asbestos testing error, but no accreditation currently for asbestos in talc products. do you think talc should be sold at all? i think with a warning and really rigorous testing system, it makes sense to allow consumers to decide for themselves. in 2020, johnson & johnson said it was going to discontinue sales of talc based baby powder in north america. they cited lower demand for baby powder. they blamed misinformation about the safety of talc. the replacement of course for talc baby powder is cornstarch baby powder. original and new baby powder cornstarch from johnson & johnson. people have a right to ask the question of, if you had another product about which there were no safety concerns,