misinformation may be about joe or hunter bidet r biden.n. e wer also know the fbi had hunter biden s laptop and december 2019, john solomon just reported they had verified its authenticity in the spring of. 2020. so there s the fbiso the involvt there, specifically telling bigg tech, hey, be carefu bigl if its about joe hunter. now we ve got the cia, we gotweh former intel officials that hadf of knowledge of the laptopicia signing on to this letter of fifty one people. and now we re reporting tonight that jim jordan reporting that in fact, activ jime cia workersf you will, or agents arepeople t involved in getting people to sign on to that. fifty one former intel list.int yeah, is that is that is that an appearance problem? s it is .f a bigger and it s part of a bigger problem. bigger problem. i knhere pro are some decent pee i know some of the people who signed that letter, decent people who think that trump is th different, that anything involvinerent.g trump justifiesy
companies, and even international companies. and they have great cyber forensics and the ability to investigate and attribute attributi attribution, and they re also a resource for our defense. they would all rely on a company like this. for six months, this was taken as stated fact. crowdstrike, got it. let s move on to the next one. by the aspring of 17, this was the first time the president started to question crowdstrike. he tweeted something. an a.p. reporter said why did you bring up crowdstrike? he said i heard it s owned by a very rich ukrainian. this is not true. but how do we get to the seed of doubt here? what we saw in the first part is you take a fact and use a fact to propel the lie. this is essentially how you make that falsehood move to where you want it to be. the answer, the story that they want out there, is that ukraine meddled in the election. there s also other entities that want that story, too. places like russia where crowdstrike is one of the biggest defe
that, what i thought was, there s going to be a violent takeover with legislation in washington against the things that we fought so hard for. i don t think it is meant in a literal way of actual violence that is going to be out there. i think you can have one side that comes in and immediately, it s the same thing that democrats accuse trump of you have to stop you. it is not part of the pattern. both sides in the wake of charlottesville, spring of 16 when he wanted to become the nominee, if he wasn t going to be the nominee, he said it would be riots in the street. it s not a one-off. it seems to be a pattern. brooke, he also said if he shot someone on fifth avenue, like he s trafficked in violence, too, so ben, we were at this new day at the beginning of the segment and we lost each other already. but i think the other issue you have to deal with is in this tweet about andrew, he doesn t mention andrew, he loves to attack black people on twitter, especially black men. he hit
and most importantly, bret, the mothers of those soldiers that didn t come home this weekend. they deserve answers, and when the time is appropriate, and the medical professionals say it s okay, sergeant bergdahl needs to give those answers and needs to be held accountable if these allegations are true. did you know people who died? i did. i knew them. they were not soldiers that worked directly for me. but we heard everything on the radio. these were sewed soldiers they were out on checkpoints. there were a spring of string of checkpoints in place. oftentimes they were attacked. we worked alongside units who lost soldiers, again, fortunately and thankfully none of mine were killed but it was far too close for comfort and it was some pretty harrowing