Page 116 - Assertions News Today

Worked to defeat him according to multiple officials familiar with his assertions and trump had intense resistance to the assessment of u.s. intelligence agencies that russia systematically interviewed in the 2016 election. along with the blame he faced on ukraine for leading many his advisers to think that putin himself helped spur the idea of ukraines culpability. the russian embassy in washington declined to discuss whether president putin told president trump that ukraine interfered in the u...

With doj inspector general michael horowitzs report into the russia investigation. its complete and clear on the fact that there was no political bias and that the russia investigation was predicated or opened properly. there are no questions though about what information attorney general barrs hand-picked prosecutor john durham could possibly turn up. and todays news make it harder to deny that durhams probe could be interpreted as inherently more political. the "new york times" is reporting th...

G20 summit in germany. but in case you dont remember this, we are now beginning to learn more about the close-door meeting at the time. which drew sharp criticism from foreign affairs experts. according to "the washington post," former white house officials said that they feared that as a result of that meeting, putin influenced the presidents views on ukraine. and the 2016 campaign. it goes on to read, in part, quote, after meeting privately with -- in july 2017 with russian president vladimir ...

New reporting this morning may explain why president trump has insisted ukraine might have interfered in the 2016 election. putin told me. thats what one former senior white house official says president trump said with the "washington post" reporting after meeting privately in july 2017 with russian president vladimir putin, president trump grew more insistent that ukraine worked to defeat him. thats according to multiple former officials familiar with his assertions. of course it was russia th...

Investigation. in fact, during the staff presentation of evidence at the judiciary committee, ranking member collins asked how did investigation was conducted that resulted in the drafting of the schiff report. but he never received an answer. during the rules committee consideration of house resolution 755, there were numerous times when the members on both sides of the aisle posed questions to our witnesses. questions they could not answer because they sit on the judiciary committee and were n...

The committees hearings. without respecting minority rights and without respecting due process rights of the president, how can anyone consider this a fair process? madam speaker, it gets worse. the articles of impeachment were considering today are based on the schiff report. the final document produced by the intelligence committee and transmitted to the judiciary committee. but the schiff report includes unsubstantiated allegations, it includes in some cases news reports as the only evidence ...

Right to call witnesses or subpoena documents and the president was denied the right to representation in the committees hearings. without respecting minority rights and without respecting due process rights of the president, how can anyone consider this a fair process? madam speaker, it gets worse. the articles of impeachment we are considering today are based on the schiff report. the final document produced by the intelligence committee and transmitted to the judiciary committee. but the schi...

For questions or to explain how his committee conducted its investigation. in fact, during the staff presentation of evidence at the judiciary committee, ranking member collins asked how the investigation was conducted that resulted in the drafting of the schiff report. but he never received an answer. during the rules committee, consideration of house resolution 755, there were numerous times when the members on both sides of the aisle posed questions to our witnesses, questions they could not ...

Time. youll have your time shortly. >> the testimony was im not going to tell you. >> how many times, mr. collins, does the schiff report mention you? >> hundreds. >> actually, only 54. it may seem like more. >> when you take one person talking off one person and another person, it goes up. >> how many times does the schiff report -- how many times in the schiff report or news reports the only evidence supporting factual assertions. >> the main factual a srgs. >> ms. raskin, my understanding is ...

You will have your time shortly. >> the testimony was im not going to tell you. >> how many times have schiff report or hearsay statements used as evidence? >> hundreds. >> only 54. >> when you take off one person talking of another person talking of another person. >> how many times has that been the only evidence -- >> repeat the question. >> how many times in the schiff report or news reports the only evidence supporting factual assertions. >> the main factual assertion was mr. sondland, one....