jury come the jury is different than them whether it s political - them whether it s political conviction them whether it s political conviction or them whether it s political conviction or racial- them whether it s political - conviction or racial composition, whatever conviction or racial composition, whatever it conviction or racial composition, whatever it is conviction or racial composition, whatever it is. very conviction or racial composition, whatever it is. very very- conviction or racial composition, whatever it is. very very rarely. conviction or racial composition, | whatever it is. very very rarely is there whatever it is. very very rarely is there grounds whatever it is. very very rarely is there grounds for whatever it is. very very rarely is there grounds for overturning - whatever it is. very very rarely is there grounds for overturning a i there grounds for overturning a verdict there grounds for overturning a verdict because there grounds f
Je nach Geschmack könnte die Entscheidung, ob man ein Auto von Tesla (WKN: A1CX3T) oder Toyota Motor (WKN: 853510) kauft, am Ende leichtfallen. Aber das Gleiche kann nicht für die Aktien der beiden Unternehmen gesagt werden. Genau wie bei den Autos hängt die Wahl zwischen Tesla- und Toyota-Aktien.
never want to see this happen again. i don t want four years from now or eight years from now or 12 years from now in another presidential election for us to be in here or for one side or the other, i don t want the republicans to say let s do benghazi again. that really worked. or the democrats to say they did it to us, let s do it to them. and i think frankly about only pointing these things out that s the only way we re going to avoid having this happen again. well, let me just ask you on that 17-year-old arb, and in light of mr. morell who came in and talked to us not about the security at the diplomatic facility but at the cia annex, his testimony was all of the improvements of the security at the benghazi base, the idea to conduct an assessment, the assessment itself, the implementation of recommendations were all done without the knowledge and direction of the director and i.
the sense that the request had been for five diplomatic security officers to accompany the ambassador. there were five there. and they did as i have testified to the very best they could. they were armed. and in the course of the thorough investigation conducted by the accountability review board, as i was saying admiral mullen zeroed in on this having a more than 40 years experience in the military. and he wanted to know why the ds agents had not fired their weapons. and they explained as many since have heard who have interviewed them, their assessment was that it would have resulted in the loss of even greater life. and they chose not to. and admiral mullen reached the conclusion that they acted appropriately. so even though we had the five ds agents that had been requested, they were overrun and unable to do more than they did.