You would ever be able to use. Its very large. Thank you. Okay, anybody else wish to comment on item 18 . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Supervisor avalos. Just one more question perhaps for mr. Masery. We have 150 for extra net and 50 for verizon and then we heard two other carriers, mobility and ground castle. Do we expect to see many, many more companies coming in as well to make installations, to extend their networks, is this the tip of the iceberg, what do we expect moving forward . We are receiving a lot of interest from different carriers and i would also note there is discussion of maybe using small cells to boost Public Safety coverage as part of the program known as burst net to improve public capacity not just using older analog radios especially in areas like downtown San Francisco. So we could also see Public Networks using these facilities as well. Whats governing, say, on the same block theres a dos carrier and a verizon carrier and a mobility carrier and a grou
Approval of these items and welcome any questions you may have. Okay, thank you, miss whitly. Colleagues, no questions at this time. Mr. Rose, can we go to your report, please . Mr. Chairman, members of the committee, on the bottom of page 19 we note the assessor will expend about 2,570,000 in 1415 and 1617 and all of the grant funds and matching funds will be used to cover the salaries and benefits for the 9 newly created staff positions. We also note on page 20 of our report that the source of the matching funds will be Nongeneral Fund moneys obtained through a work order with the department of building inspection and the 4 positions will be funded by a dbi work order were previously approved by the board of supervisors in 1415. Our recommendations on page 21 we recommend that you amend the ordinance that is file 141181 to require designation in the citys Budget System of the 5 positions funded by the state grant that is 2 class 4261 Real Property appraiser positions, 2 class 4214 Of
Expect to see many, many more companies coming in as well to make installations, to extend their networks, is this the tip of the iceberg, what do we expect moving forward . We are receiving a lot of interest from different carriers and i would also note there is discussion of maybe using small cells to boost Public Safety coverage as part of the program known as burst net to improve public capacity not just using older analog radios especially in areas like downtown San Francisco. So we could also see Public Networks using these facilities as well. Whats governing, say, on the same block theres a dos carrier and a verizon carrier and a mobility carrier and a ground castle carrier, they could all be on the same block if they had different carriers. Yes, if they have good design features. When we have areas where we have decorative lights we want them to attach on the inside rather than on the outside over a long period of time. Colleagues, if no further questions or comments, we have t
20152016 budget. We are going to add 4 Real Property appraisers and these funds provided the opportunity for us to seek these additional outside resources so we thank you for your support and your approval of these items and welcome any questions you may have. Okay, thank you, miss whitly. Colleagues, no questions at this time. Mr. Rose, can we go to your report, please . Mr. Chairman, members of the committee, on the bottom of page 19 we note the assessor will expend about 2,570,000 in 1415 and 1617 and all of the grant funds and matching funds will be used to cover the salaries and benefits for the 9 newly created staff positions. We also note on page 20 of our report that the source of the matching funds will be Nongeneral Fund moneys obtained through a work order with the department of building inspection and the 4 positions will be funded by a dbi work order were previously approved by the board of supervisors in 1415. Our recommendations on page 21 we recommend that you amend the
I guess maybe this is more a question to the mayors budget office. You may not know but in terms of facilities and wifi we purportedly have it in this building and its horrible and just like the Market Street wifi is horrible and so many of the city provided Wifi Networks are in inadequate and at least we have it and it works sometimes and i guess more of a question for d tbut a broader question. I mean city facilities we should have free Wifi Everywhere but particularly in city facilities. If we cant put it in our own facilities how do we roll it out to the whole city . I dont know if you can comment on that. Sorry to put you on the spot. I think thats why i am here. Thank you for the question. As i think the cao talked about last week dt and coit put together a connectivity plan that is part of the plan adopted by the board this week. The first issue is connectivity of the city buildings and the First Priority is the fire stations. The fire chief and i just spoke about this issue yes