Page 3 - Audio Feed News Today

Rights, people should be allowed to do this. I would say that by Banning Jones and by shadow banning many others, facebook and others are now effectively becoming a publisher, and that means because they are taking editorial decisions come they should be open to being sued as other Media Organizations are. Tammy now i would argue, we are all trying to find some balance here because we clearly see its unfair and it ranges from congressman being shadow band, we are trying to find a free market, es...

Theres been a trend to do that. broadcastify has also seen a trend of some of the largest cities in the countries who have gone to encryption actually make their live audio available to the general public through broadcastify, cities like chicago and baltimore, who just recently encrypted their day-to-day communications. they provide a delayed live audio feed because they see the benefit of the community hearing the day-to-day operations of their agencies. >> when i read the story about this sub...

Well over 40 years. there has been a trend do that, but broadcastify has also seen a trend of some of the largest cities who have gone to encryption actually make the live audio available to the general public through broadcastify. cities like chicago and baltimore who just recently encrypted their day to day communications, they provide delayed audio feed because they see the benefit of the community hearing the day to day operations of their agencies. >> when i read the story about this subjec...

Sells nuclear secrets to a foreign adversary, because in each of these scenarios, the president could assert that he was simply executing the laws, or communicating with the department of justice, or discharging his powers as commander-in-chief, or engaging in foreign diplomacy. under the defendants framework the nation would have no recourse to deter a president from inciting his supporters during a state of the union address to kill opposing lawmakers, thereby hamstringing any impeachment proc...

The summer of 2024, this case will come to trial. my hope, and i dont know that doj will take this position, but my hope here is that there will be some level transparency. neil and others, melissa and others know that there are federal rules that preclude cameras in courtrooms. we saw just yesterday where trumps new attorney in this case has called for cameras in the courtroom. i dont know that doj would ever agree to that, but my hope is at the very least that they would not oppose it. and per...

Stockpiling of essentially treasonous possibility on the part of the president, the victims are all of us, 300 million americans. very few of us can fit into that courtroom. allowing the press to sit there and then simply report after the fact is no substitute for at least a live audio feed if this judge is not removed but enrichment newspapers i guess virginia, the case im referring to, the supreme court said that you have to have a neutral adjudicator. you have to have public access, even if t...

All of us would like to see more and get into the minds of what jack smith is thinking, the court filings are going to be how they make their arguments. i will say this, though, i agree with calls of allowing a live audio feed of this trial when it begins. >> no video? >> you know, there are legitimate concerns about witness tampering and witness intimidation that i think we would have to think through, but at the very least, the supreme court has audio, live audio feeds of their oral arguments,...

Are, actually would not necessarily agree with that. i think that voters are everywhere nowadays. and i think they are just as likely going to be on twitter as they are going to be watching a particular network on cable news. the difference is reliability. cable has a reliable seed. that is something that sports networks are wrestling with when theyre trying to figure out if they put those shows on screaming services. and because of that, we know when it is going to air. we know it is going to -...

The defendant? and here? the defendant is donald j. trump with his presumption of innocence. will this create an image that may be harmful to him ? so the judge has to wait those factors. theres no science to it. one outcome that i think is possible here. the judge may sort of try to thread the needle and allow an audio feed of some sort so that we can all follow along. without cameras to avoid that potentially damaging visual of donald trumps standing at the defendants table, and i want to let ...

Its fine. hell enter a guilty excuse me. hell enter a plea of not guilty in all likelihood, and then the judge will set bail. in this case there will be what we call released on own recognizance. meaning you dont have to post any money. you dont have to wear an ankle bracelet. just come back for your next court date. and if you dont do that, then well get more severe in the bail conditions, and then hell be released and well have a schedule well have. well have the table set for pretrial motions...