Citys economy is expected to expand about 985 jobs an average annual number. Including an average of 340 construction jobs during the construction period and post construction employment gains are associated with the higher personal income in the city and also the employment needed in the non residential part of the project to support the new population and thats a summary of our report. Be happy to take any questions that you have. Seeing no questions thank you mr. Egan for your work on this project. So madam chair id like to go ahead and move into Public Comment if possible. All right so Public Comment is open just want to remind you you have 2 minutes. First we have nelson please come up to the podium nice to see you. Thank you good morning. Glad to be the first one here just to kind of get it moving because its been a long time took us a long time to get here and to get to the end of this but thats a good thing because we know theres some consistent cy and today hopefully get to th
Franciscos borders extend further than they think and we must act collectively. Transportation infrastructure changes cut me off but i do speak in support of this project thank you very much. Thank you very much. Next speaker. Jim. Good morning committee. My name is jim growdin im affiliated with the Visitacion Valley Planning Alliance and green way and both projects are there to better Visitacion Valley and im i came here today to ask your support in the funding of the project. Thank you. Thank you very much. Good to see you good morning. Next we have mat and after mat is marlene tran and then jonathan and fran martin. Good morning everyone. I just want to speak on behalf of residents and neighbors who couldnt make it here today. Wed like you to approve this development and feel its a huge impact to our community. Thank you. Thank you very much. Mat. Good morning supervisors. Delighted to be here to once again endorse this acquisition theres 3 key reasons i want to draw your attention
Name is jim growdin im affiliated with the Visitacion Valley Planning Alliance and green way and both projects are there to better Visitacion Valley and im i came here today to ask your support in the funding of the project. Thank you. Thank you very much. Good to see you good morning. Next we have mat and after mat is marlene tran and then jonathan and fran martin. Good morning everyone. I just want to speak on behalf of residents and neighbors who couldnt make it here today. Wed like you to approve this development and feel its a huge impact to our community. Thank you. Thank you very much. Mat. Good morning supervisors. Delighted to be here to once again endorse this acquisition theres 3 key reasons i want to draw your attention to the first is of course this is a very efficient neighborhood in this valley and a developer thats committed to pay for the construction of these new parks and finally this acquisition would address all of the priority needs laid out particularly the one t
Drawn. There two different private sector models. The model that has been2g endod by the president and the subject of Congress Said Telephone Companies will continue to keep the meta data as their own Business Records and they will be approved fromyl7 obtaining t from the Telephone Companies. There was an alternative proposed that its important to understand what the program was essentially was with them inquiries of it based on reasonable suspicion that they were associated with terrorism. What they are moving towards now is making that query of the Telephone Companies. The intermediate model was lets give the bulk meta data to a third party who would hold it and have the government have the ability to sending the queries. I dont think there was any substantial support for that both because it creates a new security program. You know how it held with somebody else and it didnt seem to provide substantial privacy protections. Lets open it up now for questions from the audience so we wi
Power below cost, there just is not enough money to do all the things that are good and that we would want to do. And, so, the fiscal plan for the pucs power enterprise was balanced the last two. Previous to that it was not balanced and it showed a shortfall. But it did you point out that it is relatively straightforward if we dont have more revenues to pay for costs, we could only buy what we can afford to. So, here again now, we fast forward two years three new pieces of information mean costs even larger than what we have ever assumed. Mountain tunnel was already in last years capital plan [speaker not understood]. It was in it for the last several as far as the maintenance work, but it was in at 100 million of cost. With the potential for collapse of the mountain tunnel which would disrupt the water supply and a recently completed engineering study, though costs have gone upwards of 6 28 million ~. So, that, sir, is new, and i do understand that that would be a very surprising and