Page 22 - Balancing Test News Today

Defendants, suspects coul get a lawyer. youidthat after eight hours and after you had aeady gotten him lking. theres criticism about injecting the possibility that a suspect will not provide inigence ifyou give them thamiranda warning. take me through that procesof whathe balancing test is befo miranda is actuall issued? >> i wouldnt say wtalk to hi eight hours without giving him his miranda warngs. what you do is use the public safy exption that the supre ourtefined to makeke sure there are no ...

Defendants, suspects coul get a lawyer. youidthat after eight hours and after you had aeady gotten him lking. theres criticism about injecting the possibility that a suspect will not provide inigence ifyou give them thamiranda warning. take me through that procesof whathe balancing test is befo miranda is actuall issued? >> i wouldnt say wtalk to hi eight hours without giving him his miranda warngs. what you do is use the public safy exption that the supre ourtefined to makeke sure there are no ...

Legal, because of the overriding concern about an ongoing event and possibility of other things happening to the innocent. >> exactly. in a lesser case, it would end there but in this case, i suspect the prosecutors will argue to the judge they should be able to use these statements as well. it will be up to a judge will he allows them in. my prediction is theyre not going to need the statements. >> thats the sort of thing which -- i mean is just beyond into the exclusion of most courts. a judge...

Care. so they have a balancing test. well give you this if you give the illegal aliens care. no one has really identified who they are or how many there are, but theyre saying, well, these interests are equal. and if you look at it, the interests are not equal. >> and if you think about it, too, by the way, carol malony in a real challenge, perhaps, for her seat up for election. let me ask you something -- there was a time that no one would touch the 9/11 survivors, their families and the 9/11 r...

Intentional infliction, that makes no sense. >> not invoking their ethical obligation to do what is common sensical and what is right under the laws of common sense and human decency. bill: it is true, if someone is out to sue the videotape could be invaluable and so far the family has not indicated a desire to go there. and heres the statement from the family, it remains a time of tremendous sadness and grief for our family, and if we have it well pull it up. the mother, we believe of dawn in t...

Family member. then number two, they backed that up that even if it were, it was paid back. and number three is, we dont know the chronology of when this occurred. but the fact of the matter is that can be muddied up and diffuse the campaign payment notion. thats what this is all about, dara. >> its amazing they are muddying up what has already been muddied. >> they really are. and it is so interesting because the -- it is clear that ill flip my analysis a little bit. we made statements on air f...

It, what rfra provided was a balancing test. what rfra gives these individuals is a day in court. >> but that isnt a good idea. it means everybody has to lawyer up. what about having private life, to do what you want, as long as you dont physically assault a gay person. >> in the last 22 years, there hasnt been one single case when a restaurant opener said i will not serve you because youre gay. not one single case where they won in court. >> the reason i supported the religious freedom restorat...

This video, of course the french police say its a fake. but the magazine stands by its report. arkansas gave final approval to a law similar to indiana. walmart, based in arkansas is taking a stand. it publicly came out against that bill yesterday and its ceo urged a veto back in indiana, nine ceo s have sent a law demanding it be changed. >> it cuss not give any right to deny services to anyone in this state. its simply a balancing test used by our federal courts and jurisdictions across the ...

Individual people can assert. i know there are attempts to carve out exceptions, well, you cant say we are not covering blood transfusions and things but when you get down to it when they talk about sincerely reld religious views do we know if there will be a slippery slope? how can we say it wont expand this protection into other areas? >> no. there wont be a slippery slope. the opinion was clear. they said the law requires a balancing test. you have to balance the burden on religious freedom. ...

So they can have a day of rest and they play christian music. they donated millions to christian causes. they make no secret what kind of company they are and they said that essentially there were four of the 20 mandated contraception methods they couldnt go along with. in their belief, that can trigger abortions so theres no way to facilitating that in any way. the justice said the law makes it clear congress didnt want to discriminate in any way against men and women that want to run their bus...