was making were false. i ve been consistent since day one, there weren t thousands of dead people. we found four. there weren t 66,000 underage voters, there was zero. zero nonregistered voters. so every allegation made we ran down the line and maid sure we had the facts. you can hear brad raffensperger on the famous tape where donald trump asked him to findes he told trump he was wrong about another lie that election workers had engaged in ballot stuffing in ful county, georgia. why dy put the votes in thretimes? they put them in three times? mr. president, they did not do that. we did an audit of that and proved conclusively they were not scanned three times. so he was told and yet four days later, on january 6th, trump repeated that lie again. similar stories played out in five other states, trump claimed
the supreme court applied that case to a ballot stuffing case. i don t think that was a proper application of it because the original in at any time of the statute was to prevent violent activity. the supreme court decided the injure part of the statute could be applied to ballot stuffing because you were diluting the votes of legitimate voters. so that was an injury at most to the act of voting. and i think that was a stretch. i believe what the supreme court today would look at the situation and say look, we are not even comfortable with the idea of applying that statute to ballot stuffing, but we don t have to disturb that precedent to say this is even further removed because what trump is being accused of is these activities that he did to try to get the elections reversed or remanded back to the states, so the legislatures could revisit them. the idea would be they would cancel out the
knew, there wasn t fraud. this particular mention of jason miller in the charging document, it notes that he spoke with donald trump on a daily basis, told him fraud claims were untrue, ballot stuffing that was being alleged in georgia were not happening, there were not a number of dead voters in georgia that would be sizeable enough to swing the election. he would et in an email on december 8th, a month after the election before the trump electors come together to try and certify trump won jason miller writes in an email, the campaign legal team can t back up the team backed up by the elite strike force team. i ll obviously hustle but it s tough to own any of this when it s just conspiracy beamed down from the mothership. that s what he was saying to
january 6th investigation. now, this is a civil lawsuit, civil liability. that is a separate question from what a prosecutor might want to do in a criminal probe. but it s very likely that giuliani, when he sat down with the special counsel s office a few weeks ago to speak with them voluntarily, that he was asked about what happened in georgia, some of the things that he said there. we know that investigators from the federal government have circled around those events in georgia, even getting access to the security footage from the state farm arena where these women would have been captured on a video that giuliani then circulated to try to accuse them of ballot stuffing when it was not true. so where it fits into what the special counsel s investigation is doing and what the communication has done between the criminal investigators and giuliani and his team, that is going to be a big mystery that could lead us in a lot of different places. certainly could. elliott, is giuliani now