Page 2 - Bannon Case News Today

Chuck. a federal judge, in a civil case today, wrote that trump and his lawyer, john eastman, quote and to overturn a democratic election and inaction unprecedented in american history. it was a coup, in search of a legal theory. that was a federal judge, suggesting that trump committed a crime. people, obviously, are going wild over it. but, will it actually impact with the justice department does, or donald trump in any real way? >> >> i dont think so. let me tell you why. and the case in los ...

Shes going back to poland and so there is a sense of insecurity here and a lot of people you speak to say yes, this is a safe haven, but how long will it remain a sanctuary? how long will it remain a refuge for all of these people? you constantly get air raid sirens going off here. that shakes the people of that have come here for safety. you see it day in day out. aerate sirens go off at all hours. we had one just a couple of hours ago and you see mothers with their young children with their el...

So, i am not surprised that we have not seen an indictment of meadows yet. i am not surprised that we did see an indictment of bannon. very different cases. the new referrals, that we may see soon, scavino, and navarro, are more like the meadows case, and less like the bannon case. >> why? >> simply, bannon did not work in government. his conversations with trump, not covered by any sort of privilege, moreover, bannon simply stonewall the committee. he didnt cooperate at all. they cooperated to ...

Hours ago and you see mothers with their young children with their elderly grandparents, their dogs, their, cats suddenly scrambling out of the hotel room and whatever positions they can gather. and go into with they call it an air raid shelter, but its really a basement. its not a bomb shelter. but they have to go there to seek refuge in case a bomb lands in here. but thankfully, the center of the city has not been targeted. so far, it doesnt seem to have any strategic value for vladimir putin,...

See soon, scavino, and navarro, are more like the meadows case, and less like the bannon case. >> why? >> simply, bannon did not work in government. his conversations with trump, not covered by any sort of privilege, moreover, bannon simply stonewall the committee. he didnt cooperate at all. they cooperated to an extent. navarro, and scavino, like meadows, worked for the president, worked in the white house, and, arguably, and i am not saying i believe its a strong claim, but, arguably, had thei...

So, this last much longer. in the meantime, you are right. steve bannon can say, and do, as he pleases, knowing it can impact him later at trial. knowing the consequences themselves are so steep, he may not risk a fine of $100,000, or jail time. >> lets talk about civil cases, chuck. a federal judge, in a civil case today, wrote that trump and his lawyer, john eastman, quote and to overturn a democratic election and inaction unprecedented in american history. it was a coup, in search of a legal ...

Up there in the north and northeast today. >> do you think, general theyre going to try to split the country like northern south korea? >> the could be the case. if you take a look at as we sit here today, he has already announced these two regions, then if you move over westward, you have the donbas area. now hes trying to take mariupol, and hes pushing that pretty hard. the problem is, because we have so many troops protecting kyiv, ukrainians have small forces down there in mariupol. if he ta...

Ukraine and forces have shown that they could go toe to toe and do better than russian forces. the president still in power. and the people of ukraine, theyve shown resilience and determination even under the bombs and missiles attacking this country. i think well continue to happiness russia will continue to try to press ukraine. we saw that today. it was obvious that they were trying to find a weak point in the defense of kyiv and the ukrainian forces did a great job today repel in that partic...

Has already been referred. by the way, one additional point, stephanie. the justice department does not need referrals in order to prosecute someone. sometimes, i worry that it will have a counterproductive effect, meaning, is the department of justice, watching this play it down the middle, gets a referral from a committee. and then, from a mostly partisan vote in the full house, to prosecute someone, it may have the opposite effect. it may be the kind of case you dont want to prosecute, becaus...

And, i dont believe, you will see additional, criminal contempt prosecutions. at least, not of the two that are now being recommended. and mr. meadows case, that it has already been referred. by the way, one additional point, stephanie. the justice department does not need referrals in order to prosecute someone. sometimes, i worry that it will have a counterproductive effect, meaning, is the department of justice, watching this play it down the middle, gets a referral from a committee. and then...