Just ahead on cnn newsroom. Pushing back. Donald trumps legal team says that a protective order proposed by the Special Counsel would infringe on his First Amendment right. We will look at whether that has any legal merit. Severe weather across the u. S. Ripping off roofs, taking down power lines and disrupting more than 10,000 flights. Details on the plot ukraine says it foiled to assassinate president Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Good to have you with us. The judge in Donald Trumps Election Subversion Case appears ready to move forward quickly. She is looking to schedule a hearing this week on how to handle evidence and what trump can say publicly about the case. Prosecutors and Defense Attorneys are facing a three pm eastern deadline. 13 hours from now to come up with options. The Justice Department wants restrictions on trump. Fearing that he could disclose Sensitive Information or intimidate potential witnesses. The former president s attorneys say that would infringe on his First Amendme
exclusively that former new york police commissioner barry kerik talked to special counsel investigators. it was mostly about the efforts in between the election in june six. of what the giuliani teams. doing this meeting is the first known steps since the special counsel office filed charges. against president trump last week. attorney saying he does not believe trump s former lawyer rudy giuliani will be indicted. what a chance. also, trump s lawyers arguing in a new court filing. that they should not be restricted from talking publicly about some evidence in the election interference probe. the press and american people in a campaign season have a right to know what the evidence is in this case. while so-called protective orders are not unusual, prosecutors say that is especially important in this case. because of trump s public