obstruction, conspiracy, lying and espionage. what happens now? when it comes to republicans in congress, this time it is not so certain. a lot of them are split. some are willing to stick by donald trump, like senator eric schmidt of missouri who said that the charges are, quote, unequal application of the law. nor senator john barrasso of wyoming who said, quote, it feels political, it s rotten. others are being a little more cautious. after all, these are espionage charges. there s, quote, no way to defend the allegations said rep don bacon of nebraska. i would not feel comfortable with a convicted felon in the white house, said a rep from colorado. there isn t a clear ideological common denominator within this split. we re going to explore why that is. what is clear, and maybe this is part of the reasoning for some is that this indictment might not be the only criminal trouble that former president trump could be in. there are two more investigations related to overturnin
talking about, part of what police say was taking so long was they needed to just find out where everyone was and interview them about what happened. what is penny s best defense here? so he s going to say that he was acting in self-defense. he ll try to persuade the jurors that he was afraid that mr. neely was going to kill or seriously injure someone on the train. he ll say that based on what mr. neely was doing, that was a reasonable belief, and, katy, the evidence seems to contradict that defense in part, but that same kind of argument worked for bernard guest, the so-called subway vigilante who shot four young black man on a subway in new york and was found not guilty by a new york jury in 1987. that s true. all right. thank you very much, paul butler. appreciate your time. coming up next, what will be different the next time you buy concert tickets or rent a car?