superintendent carranza. here. murase. here. wynns. here. mendoza-mcdonnell. here. if you would please join me in the pledge of allegiance. [pledge of allegiance]. mr. superintendent you had an announcement for the meeting tonight. yes thank you. on item number 29 the worksheet was inadvertently admitted into the agenda. the second announcement is a correction to the superintendent proposal 166 14s4- this should read should be submitted for adoption not for first reading before adoption. thank you. for those of you who are joining me this evening and want to address the board of education please submit a speaker card and submit them to the clerk before the item is called. item a is approval of the board minutes.the next item is item b. item b ispresentations to the board of education/superintendents reports our students are taking dance and drama and guitar and orchestra and the year they ll take mary archie orchestra to and one of our recovery classes
okay welcome to the san francisco board of supervisors budget & finance subcommittee for wednesday, july 20, 2016, my name is mark farrell i ll be chairing the committee and joined by supervisor yee and by the supervisor tang. thank you clerk linda wong and mark as nona melkonian from sfgovtv for covering the meeting madam clerk, any announcements? yes. yes. board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated. thank you, madam clerk we were here quite late madam clerk call number one. the approval for the calendar year 2017 to remove the rates from ohio and colleagues this is something i sponsored on the health board and the representative i want to welcome the amazing director katherine dodd. thank you. good morning members of the board brown today a administrative code for the health service and calendars year 2017 this the stacey a monthly contribution the charter requires the employer contribute towards the health premiums for the 10 couldn t average based o
we re looking at a total of approximately 1.1 million. this is an increase of approximately 13% from last year s budget. we were anticipated to spend 28% on personnel and s sfmta staff and wearing timma hat scption we are spending on professional services and consultants in the areas of planning engineering design and communications and environmental services. we are spending 3.8%, the are maintaining of the budget on non personnel costs and operational costs in relation to rent, the commissioner fees, printing, audit and legal sfeesas necessary to run the timma agency. in terms of revenues we will expect to receive approximately $1 million from the tida agency and the remaining difference of $81,000 will be funded with prop k funds through an appropriation previously approved and passed in the previous fiscal year. this item has already gone before the sf mtc a budget and a proorded with the budget on the 28th. staff and i am here to answer any questions that you have on thi
consent calendar and if you object and can be considered separately. any comments on the consent calendar? seeing none let s open it up for public comment on consent. if you would like to speak on items two and three and seeing none public comment is now close the. can we take a motion on the consent calendar. so moved. we can do that without opposition. commissioner campos. aye. commissioner kim. aye. consent calendar is approved. mr. clerk can we call the next item. item 4 is recommended adoption of the proposed fiscal year 2016-2017 annual budget and work program. this is an action item. good afternoon commissioners. cynthia fong director for finance and administration. what i have before you is the fiscal year 2016-2017 budget for the timma against. this year we continue our work program to advance treasure island implementation plan and advancing the operations agreement and the system and engineering programs. for expenditures in this budget we re
the appellant. when i was up here before i kind of veerdz off any script and didn t make all the points i want to thank crown castle lawyer for making a couple of points one was about the hearing he just to be clear what happened at the hearing relevant to public comment. essentially yes, there were 10 permits being reviewed that day but the hearing officer had said explicitly mr. don t come up and speak unless itself your permit up for appeal that it seems to me to be a pretty gross way to characterize a procedure that is set up for public review if they re coming back with a charter the discretion of hearing officer to keep represent tuesday comments at bay appeal after appeal i ll ask what is going on a whole group of people giving rec & park tissue and that hearing was messy and unorganized i don t ascribe a envelope reduce what s the relationship between the pen company and that stuff i don t know those are interesting requests how i m populated to understand something