and tonight, donald trump s criminal defense team is renewing its requests for judge tanya chutkan to hold special counsel jack smith in contempt of court. with the election interference case currently on hold while trump s immunity claims get worked out in a federal appeals court, trump s lawyers lot of activity in the case halted, even the routine filing of documents which jacks mitt s team has said is permissible because it does not require the trump team to do anything. the motion to punish a jack smith for something that he is not prohibitive from even doing is yet another example of how donald trump has always referred to live in the world of alternative facts. with that strategy, it s on a collision course with the courtroom reality. that s what we saw this week as the disgraced former presidents that up for just a few minutes, in his own defense and the new york attorney generals civil fraud trial, when trump rambled, dissembled and presented himself as usual, as a
if judge kaplan let too much happen. you know what s interesting about edematous case, his guilt is already established. there is a composite tory phase, where there is a request now for 10 million in damages, which is the quantity to help miss carroll get her life back, her reputation back, to try to restore her sense of life for the great threats, the threats of death, et cetera. beyond compensatory, this jury, which has the real power, here can award punitive damages, and they can punish trump for his forecast resistance in the media. by that, i mean, continuing to defame her, continuing to ignore the evidence, continuing to really push that first jury verdict aside and, say who says who cares if these stories found that i defend her. i keep saying it, occupying. so, this jury can find in a bid damages for the fact that trump continues to thumb its nose at
show damages? of course he would have to show damages. bill: how about emotional damages? everybody who has seen juan knows that he is torn up about it. torn up about it. saddened by it. there would have to be punitive damages at that point. it s going beyond compensatory. and also to sue for the remainder of his contract. how many months were left he would be entitled to that if they in fact did not give that to him. does he want to go down that long, long road of litigation. bill: if he does choose to do it you say he has a chance to win. i would love to take his in front of a jury. are you kidding me? not anyone when you present the facts and clip from your show and saying what was wrong with what he said? why was it that was not a fireable offense. bill: it would take years. i don t think he could win on breach of contract. on the racial beef he would have a really good shot. i do agree. i m telling you. bring it from front of a jury. maybe they would settle
show damages? of course he would have to show damages. bill: how about emotional damages? everybody who has seen juan knows that he is torn up about it. torn up about it. saddened by it. there would have to be punitive damages at that point. it s going beyond compensatory. and also to sue for the remainder of his contract. how many months were left he would be entitled to that if they in fact did not give that to him. does he want to go down that long, long road of litigation. bill: if he does choose to do it you say he has a chance to win. i would love to take his case in front of a jury. are you kidding me? not anyone when you present the facts and clip from your show and saying what was wrong with what he said? why was it that was not a fireable offense. bill: it would take years. i don t think he could win on breach of contract. on the racial beef he would have a really good shot. i do agree. i m telling you. bring it from front of a jury. maybe they would s
show damages? of course he would have to show damages. bill: how about emotional damages? everybody who has seen juan knows that he is torn up about it. torn up about it. saddened by it. there would have to be punitive damages at that point. it s going beyond compensatory. and also to sue for the remainder of his contract. how many months were left he would be entitled to that if they in fact did not give that to him. does he want to go down that long, long road of litigation. bill: if he does choose to do it you say he has a chance to win. i would love to take his case in front of a jury. are you kidding me? not anyone when you present the facts and clip from your show and saying what was wrong with what he said? why was it that was not a fireable offense. bill: it would take years. i don t think he could win on breach of contract. on the racial beef he would have a really good shot. i do agree. i m telling you. bring it from front of a jury. maybe they would s