Beyond Reasonable News Today

By Harry Awurumibe, Editor, Abuja Bureau A Development/Human rights lawyer, Eze Onyekpere has argued that the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal (PEPT Justices based their judgements on cases brought to them by Peter Obi, the presidential candidate of Labour Party (LP), Abubakar Atiku of Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and Princess ChiChi Ojei of Allied Peoples Movement

The Met agreed to pay compensation to Daniel Morgans family 18 months after they announced plans to sue the force, alleging that a decades-long cover-up of corruption.

He led one of only two successful private prosecutions in the 20th century and was the foremost criminal lawyer of his day.

Not since the 1980s has a first time entrant in the Garryowen taken out the most prestigious horse competition for […]

Speaking to FEMAIL, experts explained repeatedly adapting tried-and-tested films, novels and podcasts is a way to guarantee viewership in a competitive landscape.

A civil willful FBAR violation does not mean a person violated any Criminal Law. It just means that the US person who did not properly disclose their…

It turned into an eight-year odyssey that included a farcical retrial hearing followed by Arthur Allan Thomas being pardoned and awarded $1-million in compensation.

As we release the second episode of our new true crime podcast, read an extended look at Carol Xs fight for justice after being brutally attacked.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com. There is a significant difference between proving someone is innocent and being found not guilty because the prosecution have not been able to prove its case Beyond Reasonable Doubt. The differences may be understood by considering the meaning of the concept Beyond Reasonable Doubt . Someone who is charged with a criminal offence is presumed to be an innocent person, until they are found to b...