nope. going to have to correct you there, donald. that is in fact not the law, which is how you ended up in a court of law just yesterday. plus, gaslighting efforts kick into high gear on the right with false equivalencies flying fast and furious all over fox. and later, the great rachel maddow joins me to talk about her amazing new podcast that takes us back in time eerily similar to those we are experiencing today. we begin tonight on donald trump s birthday. he turned 77 years old today. happy birthday you twice indicted, twice impeached found liable for sexual abuse former president! i m sure it s been an interesting one. a day of reflection perhaps on what matters in life like family, good health, community, or not. i mean, this is donald trump we re talking about. so what matters in life are things, gold toilets, celebrity tchotchke collections, gold stuff on the walls in the gold ballroom or the shaquille o neal sneak he bragged about to a wall street journal
American history tomorrow, opening arguments are set to begin in the first where he is facing dozens of charges related to film actress Stormy Daniels. Tonight, trump is lashing out at the judge, again, calling for the gag order to be removed. Ahead of a hearing on tuesday. Prosecutor said last week that trump had already violated that order seven times already. Lets get straight to cnns Marshall Cohen and joins me here on set. So marshall, tomorrow is going to be unprecedented in so many ways. What are you going to be looking out for . Well, i am not looking to see the judge take that gag quarter away. Right. We all know thats not going to happen. Thats just trump lashing out. He is allowed to attack the judge. He is allowed to attack the da, but he is not permitted to talk about the other prosecutors, the staff at the court. And importantly, the Family Members of the judge. So he is toeing the line. Theyre going against the judge saying playing playing within the rules and limitation
From the Mueller Report would be unsupportable in the house and unsustainable in the senate. Do you remember writing that . Yes, i do. Why did you write that . Because i think its true. The fact is this was reviewed by main justice. The special counsel did not reach a conclusion and he should have. I think his justification quite frankly was a bit absurd not reaching a conclusion. The Deputy Attorney general did, and they came to the right conclusion. I dont think this is a real case for obstruction. But then this body would be impeaching the president on the basis of the in verse conclusion. I dont believe it would be appropriate. The gentlemans time is expired. Miss dean. Thank you, mr. Chairman. Words matter. In my earlier life i was a professor of writing. I taught my students to be careful and clear about what they put to paper. That is a lesson the framers of our constitution understood far better than anyone. They were laying the foundation for a new form of government, one that
adult film actress back in 2016 to keep her mouth shut to stop her from going public with allegations of an affair with donald trump, which he denies the payment was made through donald trump s than attorney michael cohen. he he is a star witness for the prosecution the theory of the case, alex, according to the prosecutor s, is that those payments that were given back to michael cohen through the trump organization, that they were falsified records. they were claimed to be legal expenses when really it was a hush money payment types teddy 2016 election to keep that information away from the voters. you mentioned michael cohen. we don t have witness lists yet that has not yet been revealed, but we have a sense of who could be called& these are some big names that many people are familiar with. yeah, big cast of characters from back 2016 michael cohen, he s a big one. stormy daniels will tell her side of the
and in 1934, for a whole bunch of very interesting reasons, involving a whole bunch of sort of very interesting big cast of characters, they had a january 6th. they had a right wing violent mob attack the seat of government to stop the peaceful transfer of power. and it happened on february 6th in 1934. and when they marched on the french parliament, it worked. they actually stopped the transfer of power to the center left prime minister who was supposed to be giving his inaugural speech that day in their parliamentary system, and they instead installed this sort of pro fascist very right wing government. it worked. i mean, it didn t work forever. but it did work in the short-run. and so it helps us imagine what might have happened if january 6th had worked that day. i think it helps us realize what the sort of short and medium term consequences could be. one of the really interesting