Big Wikileaks News Today

About wikileaks ahead of the big wikileaks dump and cnn is right that the president told mr. mueller he did no such thing, he never had that conversation, how serious is that? >> i think that that would be extremely serious. >> how would mueller go about proving that if he wanted to prove that the president had lied to the special counsel about that matter? >> so the proof issue is significant. no ones relying on michael cohens word unless its corroborated. the first thing you do is try to get r...

Truth now on this, on both sides of this, that he heard the president and stone talking about wikileaks ahead of the big wikileaks dump and cnn is right that the president told mr. mueller he did no such thing, he never had that conversation, how serious is that? >> i think that that would be extremely serious. >> how would mueller go about proving that if he wanted to prove that the president had lied to the special counsel about that matter? >> so the proof issue is significant. no ones relyin...

Afterwards. >> thats so exactly correct. thank you for making that point. there is a big wikileaks dump in june. there is a big wikileaks dump in october within 45 minutes of the release of the access hollywood tape. and muellers latest indictment makes clear the russians were present in democratic servers through that period between june and october and may have stolen democratic party analytics. we dont know what the russians did with that, but that would be useful information for a campaign t...

Thats correct. knowledge is relevant. but it isnt knowledge at that point. thats not the only point at which his knowledge becomes relevant. if he knew about the meeting ahead of him, they went to the meeting, whether or not anything happened afterwards, there can still be a crime. conspiracy is a crime that does not need to have a fully completed act afterwards. it is about an agreement. that is the crime. and second of all, a lot did happen after that meeting. so the whole statement is prepost...

And im wondering, when you hear trump -- as he should be with his strategy -- hammering these e-mails, will it work? does the undecided voter hear e-mail and think "liar" or do they decipher the truth? >> i think undecided voters at this point -- some of those folks are low information voters and they probably wont vote and then the others are probably equally disgusted by both sides and they have to decide on election day who they want to vote for. but i dont think hes going for those undecided...