Page 4 - Bill Mark News Today

They came out swinging again, this time they were swinging at a young boy because he was wearing a make america great again cap and they took him out and tried to punch him and beat him and attack him like a schoolyard bully. the reason i make that point is that they did not bother to look into the allegations in the statements being made on social media. they just joined the social media mob. thats why i make the reference that they have become an extension of political parties and the social m...

Of simple story right, if they cant keep their agenda out of a story like this, were talking substantive, serious issues, you can not trust anything youre being told by the mainstream media. it is that simple. dont just be skeptical but perhaps go elsewhere to find the truth. mark: and you feel your litigation will help? >> well, i do. i do, mark. i believe that as i have said before if they can get away with this against a 16 -year-old boy, a minor, then we are all at risk if they want to conve...

The veracity, someone on the editorial level has a responsibility to ask those questions. we will start from the bottom come the documents, moved to reporters, moved the editors and then to the extent others are identified and if relevant we will move to them. its a monumental task but we are up for it. mark: the point is you have to prove your case. >> yes, and let me tell you, i found in my experience of the media defendants fight tooth and nail to prevent you from getting discovery. they do n...

Mark: lin wood, what is your closing statement to the american people about all this came. >> i like the american people to take a view of this from 30000 feet. this was a simple event involving a 16 -year-old boy. no punches were thrown, no blood was shed, there was an encounter and maybe people around with cameras videoing it and the media got it totally wrong. they converted the truth into falsity. they didnt because the full story advanced their agenda and if the media cant get this type

Mark: lin wood, what is your closing statement to the american people about all this came. >> i like the american people to take a view of this from 30000 feet. this was a simple event involving a 16 -year-old boy. no punches were thrown, no blood was shed, there was an encounter and maybe people around with cameras videoing it and the media got it totally wrong. they converted the truth into falsity. they didnt because the full story advanced their agenda and if the media cant get this type

Of simple story right, if they cant keep their agenda out of a story like this, were talking substantive, serious issues, you can not trust anything youre being told by the mainstream media. it is that simple. dont just be skeptical but perhaps go elsewhere to find the truth. mark: and you feel your litigation will help? >> well, i do. i do, mark. i believe that as i have said before if they can get away with this against a 16 -year-old boy, a minor, then we are all at risk if they want to conve...

Media because theres victims. now, one of the defenses will likely be this was just opinion, this isnt news so the standard is really low or nonexistent. >> protected opinion. >> weve discussed it a million times. the supreme court is already responded forming in a case where the supreme court made it clear there is no wholesale exemption for expression claiming to be opinion. opinion, something that is not capable of being proven true or false does get protection, but when you start putting in ...

>> so theres no misconceptions, it was not a correction, it was not a retraction and there was no apology. if you look at what the washington post actually did, mark, they almost patted themselves on the back in trying to say well heres what we reported and it turned out later we were wrong and we said that so palace on the back, our reporting was accurate. thats really what they said. they almost want to take the position that its okay if they lie about you and publish the lies accurately, as l...

The veracity, someone on the editorial level has a responsibility to ask those questions. we will start from the bottom come the documents, moved to reporters, moved the editors and then to the extent others are identified and if relevant we will move to them. its a monumental task but we are up for it. mark: the point is you have to prove your case. >> yes, and let me tell you, i found in my experience of the media defendants fight tooth and nail to prevent you from getting discovery. they do n...

Committing to the idea that they will do better. they are not going to do better because they cant acknowledge how badly they are reporting. mark: why do you think all the surrogates out there, former professors, former federal prosecutors, former whatever they are, lawyers on tv who know nothing about the first amendment or the constitution, as far as im concerned. they keep defending this kind of protection for the first amendment. we just discussed thats not true historically, thats number on...