Page 172 - Binding News Today

Dangerous. theres two sides. pat moynahan talked about when modernity came, premodern forces, religion and ethnicity would lose their history-shaping power. thats all we read about now days are these pre-modern forces dominating the modern age. second, i think if you look at this, region wide chaos, you realize how real is the theory we left 10, 20,000 forces in iraq none of this would be happening. this is beyond our power to control with the few forward deployed troops. >> and then, adding to ...

Its much more volatile and dangerous. theres two sides. pat moynahan talked about when modernity came, premodern forces, religion and ethnicity would lose their history-shaping power. thats all we read about now days are these pre-modern forces dominating the modern age. second, i think if you look at this, region wide chaos, you realize how real is the theory we left 10, 20,000 forces in iraq none of this would be happening. this is beyond our power to control with the few forward deployed troo...

I have to sign a more binding negotiation with the vet to have my dogs teeth cleans. senator, what do you make about where the negotiations are head and how do you answer joy flick? >> well, i think joys skepticism is warranted, chris. the negotiation are heading toward what will probably be a very general pronouncement this coming week, but the real deadline is june the 30th and the devil will be in the details there. do we get a real inspection regime that allows us to go anywhere, any time, i...

Not legally binding. i have to sign a more binding negotiation with the vet to have my dogs teeth cleans. senator, what do you make about where the negotiations are head and how do you answer joy flick? >> well, i think joys skepticism is warranted, chris. the negotiation are heading toward what will probably be a very general pronouncement this coming week, but the real deadline is june the 30th and the devil will be in the details there. do we get a real inspection regime that allows us to go ...

Qatar, u.a.e., egypt, theyre going after the situation, houthi situation, iranian encroachment in yemen. are we joining them in that effort? that puts us in an unusual position, doesnt it? >> martha, well, it is amazing under this presidents lax of leadership he create ad void. iran is putting more influence not only in yemen, they have more influence now in iraq. more influence in lebanon in syria. you see influence growing with our traditional allies, egypt, jordan u.a.e. saudi arabia, others ...

Ting opens up a global problem. we need to push back. we need to make sure they dont get that. i think ultimately united states need to seriously look at reestablishing sanctions and working our allies particularly in europe to do the same. >> do you support the congress involvement in this process. the president basically said listen, ill let you know what the deal is and ultimately i have the ability through the executive authority to do whatever i want. congress is saying advice and consent. ...

Survived. they will survive. but i think america thats our strongest ally in the middle east and its up to our leadership to support them and not support iran. why would we ever trust them? when israel is fighting for their own existence, its important to support netanyahu and thats who the people voted for. thats what the people want. we need to support israel. >> just seems like the president has a harsh language for israel and has been pretty openly hostile to the israelis but yet seems to ha...

That were trying to defend our national security if anything the letter would help them because what the letter makes clear is for any deal to be binding, it has to go through congress, and, mika the letter should not have proven necessary. if we didnt have a president like barack obama who routinely tries to circumvent congress and the senate when it comes to treaties there wouldnt be a need for a letter making clear that our constitution gives congress a vital role in lawmakering. >> im still ...

Accent of yours and you are here condemning others of speaking about their country. thats the add homonym. as to the substance of, this i would say this was not a letter about the content of the agreement and disagreement with its -- with what is in it. this was a letter saying you cannot do this without the congress, mr. president, and expect the united states as a country and the congress, the entire government as an institution to be bound by it. >> does kerry have legal footing when he says ...

Senate for confirmation. now, he announced he would do that when democrats were in control of the senate. their bipartisan criticism of the path the president is currently on. >> theres bipartisan criticism at this point of that letter itself. senator john mccain said probably should have had more discussion about it given the blowback there is. you skirted around the issue, congressman, do you think this letter has now damaged whatever negotiations are going on? would you have signed it? >> i t...