Page 6 - Bit Sets News Today

Nice negative 12 who decided his best move was to vote for the president. and fashions himself a conservative individual first and a conservative second. i think 24 national emergencies act is overly broad and i want to fix it, but nancy pelosi doesnt. therefore im voting against her resolution. one senator who predicted the back lash was john cornyn. >> i think its a dachgress step, one was because of the precedent it sets. and two, the president will get sued and it wont succeed in accomplishi...

A no unless you guys can change this because of the precedent that it sets. well wait and see how you vote. i want to ask you about north korea. you were with otto warmbiers family when his plane finally landed back in the united states when he was finally released from being held in north korea. when the president says he takes kim jong-uns word for it that he didnt know about ottos condition, do you believe him? >> its n not plausible that he didnt know about it. kim describes himself as the s...

Sets. and from texas, review this. all in the box here. as weve seen many times, when president trump kind of steps in, as you were saying, and articulates some sort of controversial policy initiative, but this is obviously going to be tied up in court and the thing is the president has this as a political argument. all it really is. >> and so many takeaways from that rose garden speech of 15 minutes off a telteleprompter. >> arranged tweeting. >> this one stood out. >> hes pretty much daring th...

It is risky, but less risky than another shutdown. >> his divided conservatives, many in his own party pleaded not to take this step. leader, mitch mcconnell, standing with him as he announced the move on the senate floor. whats at stake for the republican party? >> look, if congress wanted to stop this, there is provision to stop it. the national emergency act of 1976 says if two-thirds of both houses of congress vote to say there isnt a national emergency, then that national emergency declared...

>> you said the president should spend more time reading the constitution, less time on attempts for a power grab. are you concerned for a precedent it sets for future presidents? >> absolutely. we are a nation governed by the rule of law. this move of president trump yesterday goes above the law. i think it is extremely important we at this time in our democracy stand up for rule of law. you cant just makeup, cant just make things up when youre the president of the united states. >> it doesnt...

The national republican congressional committee. anybodys guess when the president steps out to deliver the address. the white house confirmed matt that he intends to sign the massive border deal and declare a national emergency. your thoughts? >> in the short term it will get messy. in the long term a bit scary. short term it will get challenged by the courts. democrats will force a resolution disproving of this. make its way through the senate. divide republicans. in the long term it will be s...

Keep his emergency declaration in place. and then theres a legal issue. the white house koicounsels ofe warns this carries a high risk. its warning that the president is violating the constitution. plenty of republicans are also warning the president is walking a very fine line. >> i do not see the grounds for declare i declaring a national emergency. i think thats dubious. >> at the end of the day, the justice didnt told the white house that the declaration is likely to be blocked in court. its...

Couple of months ago. here was his warning, feebl as it was. >> i think its a dangerous step, one because precedent it sets. two, the presidents going to get sued and it succeed in accomplishing his goal and third, because i think ms. pelosi may well introduce her resolution of disapproval that will pass the house and come over here and divide republicans. so to me, strikes me as a not good strategy. >> theres one of the few civil minded republicans. today peloeszy, did not commit to filing a le...

Important. >> it would be far larger act than ever occurred in the past. >> i think its a dangerous step, one because of the president it sets, two the president is going to get sued and it wont succeed in accomplishing his goal. to me it strikes me as not a good strategy. >> i hate the idea of an emergency because i always worry about that abuse with future presidents. i hope he doesnt go that far. >> i think it would be a mistake for the president to invoke his national emergency powers for th...

Opposition that theyve expressed in recent weeks. >> i dont think its a good idea. i think it would be a terrible idea. i hope he doesnt do it. >> would you fight him on it? >> sure. i think its important. >> i think its a dangerous step. one, because of the precedent it sets. two, the president is going to get sued and it wont succeed in accomplishing his goal. and third, because i think miss pelosi may well introduce a resolution of disapproval that will pass the house and come over here and d...