and if it is , what should wewe do about it?to those questions are significant enough that we wanted to find someone who could provide a definitive answer. elon mus k seemed like the right about person. musk has been thinking about a a.i. and worrying about it for most of his life. nearly a decade ago, hel he hele found a nonprofit research project called open a i. and the point was in the name,,n if we re going to have artificial intelligence and apparently we are, it ought to be open, open to the s use world that would help ensurer go that it s used for good and not evil. odotvil.that was the idea. but as the years passedd musk and musk found himselfng a preoccupied building a couple of enormous companieoupls, spacx and tesla, open, i got awayn aig from him as of tonight.pen ai open i i is no longer open. it s not a nonprofit researchprc project dedicated to using artificial intelligencel to serve humanity. it is instead a commercialtell enterpriseigentin, backed by mio a
and if it is , what should w we want to find someone who w could provide givean since tip answer, elon musk is the right person, he has beenpe thinking aboutrs it and worrying about it for his life, he helped found a nonprofit research project,pe the point was in the name, open a.i.ar ifti we have artificial intelligence it shouldre bnte t open, that io s open to the worl d. that was the idea. but as the years passedd musk and musk found himselfng a preoccupied building a couple of enormous companieoupls, spacx and tesla, open, i got awayn aig from him as of tonight.pen ai open i i is no longer open. it s not a nonprofit researchprc project dedicated to using artificial intelligencel to serve humanity. it is instead a commercialtell enterpriseigentin, backed by mio and controlled to some extent controby the democratic party.s elon musk thinks that s a problem. s thre in fact, hate believes it s a threat to human civilization, tantamount to maybe even mount more terrifying t
and if it is , what should wewe do about it?to those questions are significant enough that we wanted to find someone who could provide a definitive answer. elon mus k seemed like the right about person. musk has been thinking about a a.i. and worrying about it for most of his life. nearly a decade ago, hel he hele found a nonprofit research project called open a i. and the point was in the name,,n if we re going to have artificial intelligence and apparently we are, it ought to be open, open to the s use world that would help ensurer go that it s used for good and not evil. odotvil.that was the idea. but as the years passedd musk and musk found himselfng a preoccupied building a couple of enormous companieoupls, spacx and tesla, open, i got awayn aig from him as of tonight.pen ai open i i is no longer open. it s not a nonprofit researchprc project dedicated to using artificial intelligencel to serve humanity. it is instead a commercialtell enterpriseigentin, backed by mio a
then even to get a launchnse th licensere, there are probably n half a dozen otor more federals. agencies that need to approve it. plus state agencie sos. regula soto it s i ve been through so s many regulatory situations. it s insane. peo and , you know, sometimes i people think i m some sort off like regulatory maverick, that defi of defies regulators on a regular basis. but this is actually not a case . su knowo in once in a blue m, rarely i will disagrees with regulatorbut th. but the vast majority of the time my companies agree with regulations to comply think as anyway. s wo i think i think we shou take this seriously and we should have a regulatory agency i think needs to start with agh group that initially seeks insight into. n from i then solicits opinion from industry and then has proposedlg rulemaking and then thoseably
then even to get a launchnse th licensere, there are probably n half a dozen otor more federals. agencies that need to approve it. plus state agencie sos. regula soto it s i ve been through so s many regulatory situations. it s insane. peo and , you know, sometimes i people think i m some sort off like regulatory maverick, that defi of defies regulators on a regular basis. but this is actually not a case . su knowo in once in a blue m, rarely i will disagrees with regulatorbut th. but the vast majority of the time my companies agree with regulations to comply think as anyway. s wo i think i think we shou take this seriously and we should have a regulatory agency i think needs to start with agh group that initially seeks insight into. n from i then solicits opinion from industry and then has proposedlg