is a response to that comment which he and others found deeply offensive. well it s not just him speaking here that is destructive to the fabric of the relationship. it s the policies that he represents right? it s the policies that he represents in in the occupied palestinian territories where he runs a regime that s denying the basic human rights of palestinians. the expansion of israeli settlements against international law and stated u.s. policy and the hasty move towards confrontation with iran despite the fact that america is working with its allies around the world to try to avoid that. these are the things that are putting mr. netanyahu in direct confrontation not just with the white house, but with an american people who is tired of this approach and is growing concerned about what is happening to palestinians at the hands of this israeli let me bring in the rabbi, but your response to yousef. you know in 1938
he was serious about that. he was in the beginning of a negotiating process that in rabin stayed in power would have moved us in that direction. even ariel sharon was closer than benjamin netanyahu is. there s a larger gulf between president obama and benjamin netanyahu. plus benjamin netanyahu has been playing some pretty strident politics with the republican party. in 2012 when he invited mitt romney to come speak in israel. so there is a partisan gulf here that you see between a democratic president and a likud liko prime minister that you didn t see with sharon or itzhak rabin. thanks for joining me tonight. quick break. we re back in a moment.
to say in his speech to apac, the pro-israel lobby on monday at their big conference. i think he ll try to mend fences a bit and say he understands that israel needs to be a bipartisan issue and always has been and always should be. we ll be watching. elise labott our global affairs correspondent, thank you very much for the insight. no doubt you ve been up for many hours on that plane, that long trip over here to washington. thank you, elise, very much. to russia now, vladimir putin s critic boris nemtsov was supposed to lead a rally protesting russia s involvement in ukraine and he was murdered less than 48 hours ago and today s rally in many ways turned into as you see, a huge tribute to him. tens of thousands of demonstrators marching throughout moscow and left leaving flowers at the shooting scene and his assassination taking place yards away from the
that you have a government threatening a second holocaust of the jews 6 million jews who live in israel and we are not going to be silent. we were silent in the 1930s and 40s and that resulted in 10,000 people being gassed in auschwitz. jews do not walk into gas chambers and we will rattle the cage and we re vocal and we deserve to live and we are tired of being shot in copenhagen brussels and france and we are going to be vocal and if it makes people uncomfortable, we re sorry. thank you very much. we have to get a quick break in. i m back in a moment. with centurylink you get advanced technology solutions from a trusted it partner. including cloud and hosting services - all backed by an industry leading broadband network and people committed to helping you grow your business. you get a company that s more than just the sum of it s parts. centurylink. your link to what s next.
constructive. susan rice was on charlie rose and the prime minister speaking out to oppose a deal that would leave iran within 12 months of a breakout to a nuclear weapon could destroy the fabric of the america-israel relationship that has to be responded to. if the national security adviser of the united states of america has an issue with the leader of a nation with genocide sifrmly lysichl we all have a like schreb neebinga and kos and iran is threaten the annihilation of the jewish people. it is perverse that these negotiations are taking place without a demand that iran first totally renounce their genocidal intent against the jews. the american jewish committee called this revolting. the anti-defamation league called it perverse. the jewish federation of north america called it outrageous.