necessary for the defense of the state, the people s right to bear arms is the subject of one of the greatest pieces of fraud. i repeat the word fraud on the american public by special interest groups that i have ever seen in my lifetime. now just look at those words. there are only three lines to that amendment, a well regulated militia if the militia which was going to be the state army was going to be well regulated, why shouldn t 16 and 17 and 18 or any other age persons be regulated in the use of arms the way an automobile is regulated. it s got to be registered that you can t just deal with it at will, joining us for our discussion, jeffrey rosen, president and ceo of the national constitution center, the author of the upcoming book conversations with rbg and ruth bader ginsburg on life, liberty and law and will be available in november when we have the author back on our broadcast. jeffrey, you re the one guy i wanted to talk to on this and
going to be well regulated, why shouldn t 16 and 17 and 18 or any other age persons be regulated in the use of arms the way an automobile is regulated. it s got to be registered that you can t just deal with it at will, joining us for our discussion, jeffrey rosen, president and ceo of the national constitution center, the author of the upcoming book conversations with rbg and ruth bader ginsburg on life, liberty and law and will be available in november when we have the author back on our broadcast. jeffrey, you re the one guy i wanted to talk to on this and here is the setup, the framers could not have foreseen abortion, it s nowhere in the constitution. harry black man had an opinion to write in roe versus wade he goes to a medical hospital at the mayo clinic and comes back with the theory of trimesters. ar-15s are nowhere in the constitution. framers couldn t have foreseen them.
having proceedings televised. i think it would be good for the public. interesting, right? she was right then. the argument is even stronger today, 25 years later. there should be cameras. there should be televiseing of what goes on in the supreme court of the united states. jeffrey rossen is writing a book conversations with rbg based on talks with the justice. he s known her so long she officiated his wedding. he is president of the constitution center and a professor at george walk law school. i want to ask a hypothetical question, jeffrey. we all wish her good speed. but what s the process when you have a supreme court justice in firm and does not retire. is there any solution to that? the process is that she or he has to be persuaded to step down, justice oliver wendell holmes was in his 90s. he refused to step down. his colleagues visited him.
may be you did. that he was a special consultant to the justice department? and we now find he is now operating as comey s attorney. does that give him prison you can t talk to him about this relationship? helps to understand what comey was doing innet going the memos out. this was a revelation not only in this interview and the town halt. comey does not consider what he did leaking he redefined leaking classified information and he believes that he did not leak when he gave this memo to dan richmond for the purpose of richmond telling the new york times about temperature comey maintains this was not a leak. and said it could not have been a leak he left the fbi and no longer an employee. george wrote a book about conversations with clinton. scott wrote a book conversations