Insufficient or inadequate. They believe the circumstance eirs were not enough as well as a different project to be approved. Sequa requires study of a reasonable range of potentially feasible alternatives, promoting informed decisionmaking and public participation. Here, the eir presented circumstance alternatives including two full preservation and too preservation alternatives. Lhias position is that ten alternatives should have been study. This is unnecessary and not required by sers qua. Sequa. This contains the legally required reasonable range and provides ample information for analysis and consideration by you, the decision makers. And for an additional alternative not in the eir to be legally ar required, it must be different from those presented in the eir and must clearly lessen the projects significant impacts. On the last day of the Public Comment period, lhia submitted narratives and sketches for two projects and followed up with two more after the final er was published
Reduce loading impacts as dwell times for trucks and loading times would be reduced so they could get in and out of the building. This is not sequa issue. The appellant fails to meet the burden that the record supports reversal of the Planning Commission and dpw. It did not and cannot provide evidence in support of its evidence. The records supporting the determinations is thorough consisting of multiple years of study and analysis and based on facts and evidence rather than argument and infect allegation. Speculation. This project will transform and underutilized wallofftioff tens sites with 744 new homes. , 185 affordable units for seniors, childcare uses and neighborhood serving retail and commercial uses. We ask you reject these appeals and move forward today. Thank you, supervisors. Thank you. Any questions . I have a question of the proje project, is there a reason why it was infeasible to make a family unit affordable . So this project through the Development Agreement, it was d
Consistent with the policies and objectives of the citys general plan. The appeal also demands specific modifications to the project including the following. Limiting the height and modifications to the reuse Center Buildings and a reduction of the new building near laurel and euclid to preserve more open space and further limits on the types of nonresidential uses proposed. Related to the height of the Center Buildings, the Planning Commission supported the overall scale including the height because their placement in the center of the site set back from the public rights of way was a project objective. The project would place shorter buildings along the perimeter between 40 and 65 feet to serve the transition to the taller buildings in the center. A reduction in height of the Center Building would result in a reduction in dwelling unit count or to keep the unit count consistent, 744, and increase to other proposed New Buildings along the perimeter and compromising the compatibility.
Can you talk about that as one of the opening point you make in your great book . Guest youre right. The work you are doing is so important to enlighten the American Public about the vice grip the cartels have at the border. The horrifying and appalling impact that has the innocent people both sides of the border. One of the things i think was really important to illuminate in chapter one of what i call that Caravan Cartel is a drug cartel couldnt do it alone. Whats shocking to people is not you have explicit criminal conspiratorial out there that are making these billions of dollars in profits and endangering lives and really wreaking violence and havoc on innocent families and children at the fact you have minted benevolent charities and religious organizations that may think they are doing good deeds and, of course, we all know about that kind of road that good intentions pave, but religious organization on both sides of the border that are doing service and enabling the drug cartel
Banks exchanging billions of dollars every day and overnight lending in order to maintain their reserve ratios now this borrowing isnt free you have to put up collateral usually in the form of treasuries or other tear one securities so under normal circumstances the repo market runs smoothly the rate is steady around 2 percent and the entire system is dependent on trust trust that the borrower can pay you back plus interest its a great way for commercial banks to make money now what happened here was when the rates suddenly spite we dont actually know what happened yet because we havent seen a spike like that since 2008 and in 2008 when the rate suddenly shot up indicating that there was a risk and uncertainty in the market there were rumors going around that your partner banks were insolvent so when you hear Something Like that as a bank thats a huge risk you dont want to lend to an insolvent partner so when you see a risky client you want to charge them 5 percent 10 percent. Tiene pe