It would take to legalize, so karly can probably fill in the details. Sure, and this is one of the first removal of an unauthorized unit. Theres been a handful, but none of them have actually reached this no path to legalize issue. There was some inconsistency of how dbi was applying the standard and how planning was applying the standard. There was some confusion that the commissioners would actually be evaluating the Construction Cost or the cost to legalize. Dbi also believed that the scope of work was so extensive that the it would be infeasible for the Property Owner to legalize. Since this issue has come up on this project. Weve been working with dbi to clarify those standards and actually make them a little more arduous and closely related to life safety issues more so than a scope of work that may seem too extensive or to expensive because thats what youre going to be consider considered. Vice president richards sure. What bothers me is the Property Owner im not singling this P
Footage, dont expect more units. It doesnt even make sense. And as for the other neighbor who was happy having a family of three, i have a family of five. I mean, i wouldnt im i mean, we need three bedroom units. Two bedrooms may work for him or Something Like that, i suppose, but i hope that you would actually increase the square footage, and if you can fit in two units, that would be great. Thank you much for your time. President hillis thank you. Any additional Public Comment . Good evening, commissioners. Im actually the project sponsor. My name is kieran hardy. If you were the project sponsor, you had to speak during the presentation time. Okay. President hillis we may have questions for you. Any additional Public Comment . Seeing none, commissioner johnson . Commissioner johnson yeah, i cant be supportive of this. If you look at this lot if you look at the buildings adjacent to this lot to the left, im not sure if thats east or west, theyre multiunit, and clearly, theres some exc
Well, if he does, why not put two more floors on it from the street up top . It would match the buildings on lower terrace. If you take away square footage, dont expect more units. It doesnt even make sense. And as for the other neighbor who was happy having a family of three, i have a family of five. I mean, i wouldnt im i mean, we need three bedroom units. Two bedrooms may work for him or Something Like that, i suppose, but i hope that you would actually increase the square footage, and if you can fit in two units, that would be great. Thank you much for your time. President hillis thank you. Any additional Public Comment . Good evening, commissioners. Im actually the project sponsor. My name is kieran hardy. If you were the project sponsor, you had to speak during the presentation time. Okay. President hillis we may have questions for you. Any additional Public Comment . Seeing none, commissioner johnson . Commissioner johnson yeah, i cant be supportive of this. If you look at this
Isolated projects approach and i am wondering if you could talk about cumulative impacts as it impacts a neighborhood like this because he is making the argument in some ways i think one of his own ones that the socalled quirky fanciful Corona Heights neighborhood is being rapidly changed by these projects but planning is looking at it as a drop in the bucket of projects. I wouldnt say we considered things relative to whether or not theyre a drop in the bucket. What ceqa requires us to do in regards to these impacts and look at whether the impacts in combination with other past, present and reasonably foreseeable future projects would result in Significant Impacts overall, even if an individual project doesnt have Significant Impacts and then if there are overall Significant Impacts we have to look at whether an individual project under consideration is making a considerable contribution to that so that is how we handle the issue of cumulative impacts. A Significant Impact under ceqa i
Procedures outside of ceqa where such topics are considered. That is through the Building Permit process, the project review process, through design review, through discretionary review. This project did go through discretionary review at the Planning Commission. Anytime an approval is made the issues and neighborhood character have to be considered so there are multiple mechanisms outside of the ceqa process to consider the issues. They are not issues that rise to a level of demonstrable significance under ceqa that we would be raising as significant impacts. Thank you. Supervisor mar did you have any other questions . [inaudible] okay. Supervisor tang. Thank you. Just because this question has been brought up on a couple of occasions i just wanted to address it since supervisor mar brought it up publicly and the question around the interim zoning controls put in place and indeed because of the sponsor of the legislation lives within 500 feet and not able to place borders close to his