Multiple plagiarism charges. Is free speech under fire accused of using bias investigators to crack down on students who had uncomfortable statements. Well lay out the case and you will decide. Im in dallas, texas tonight. We begin with kristin fisher, lots of breaking news with mexico aimed at stopping the flood of illegal immigration at our southern border. Good evening. Tonight President Trump was successfully able to use the threat of tariffs to get mexico to the negotiating table and commit to take several concrete steps to help reduce migrants from illegally entering the United States. He made the announcement as he often does on twitter by saying i am pleased to inform you that the United States of america has reached a signed agreement with mexico. The tariffs scheduled to be implemented by the u. S. On monday against mexico are indefinitely suspended. Mexico has agreed to take strong measures to stem the tide of migration through mexico and to our southern border. So lets take
understand for those 40 years that the hyde amendment affected women of color? that s absolutely not my position. shannon: staff facing tough questions on the flip-flop on federal funding for abortion. he is now for it. is the media turning against the former vice president in favor of the new more progressive generation? let s discuss with brian bozell. great to have you with us tonight. thank you for having me. shannon: it is interesting. several of the pieces written today talked about this is actually a good thing. it proves that progressives when they get together and really push can bring about important change. so one of the pieces i read said it doesn t matter whether you think he is genuine or not. it pulled him to the left where the rest of the field is, mission accomplished. i would say they re not
university is quelling that speech. there are some lawsuits that are merit based, i don t see this particular lawsuit having merits because the students feel uncomfortable and university has a task force to investigate incidences. there has to be actual harm, injury and infringement inflicted. shannon: the school says that exhibit c the university of illinois is deeply committed to the core values of free speech and expression and to the open exchange of competing ideas and perspectives. this lawsuit says this bias response team is actually cracking down on the first amendment rights of students of all viewpoints to be able to do that. so it s in federal court now, brian, you have made your arguments and now we ll watch the case as it proceeds and see how the school responds and tonight see how folks at home respond. they re the jury. thank you very much. jury at home.
it. brian, why is that a bad thing? well, first of all, we have so many universities across the country that can t get their housekeeping together such as preventing sexual assaults on campus, college admissions scandals, fraternities out of control with drinking and deaths resulting from that and we have organizations set up and infrastructure set up to prohibit students from free speech? this is absolutely crazy. when is the last time somebody, for example, posted a comment about wanting to an example. a group wanted to build that wall on campus, right? they just wanted to build blocks and talk about immigration. that s an example that was prohibited on campus at the university of illinois. and that is done solely to advance a political agenda on campus. that is in violation of the first amendment. shannon: that s one of the complaints that came in. exhibit b is another complaint.